Sur 0–100 km/h, ID.5 GTX gagne (6,24 s vs 6,86 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| ID.5 GTX | iX3 G08 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,24 s−0,62 s | 6,86 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,54 s−0,54 s | 15,08 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,88 s−0,66 s | 27,54 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,33 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,64 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | ID.5 GTX | iX3 G08 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,60 s | 1,89 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,67 s | 3,16 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,51 s | 5,13 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,24 s | 6,86 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,45 s | 9,11 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,23 s | 16,42 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,54 s | 15,08 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,88 s | 27,54 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 299 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 460 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 193 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 185 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | Automatic transmission, single-speed with fixed ratio |
Off the line, the ID.5 GTX hits 100 km/h in 6.24 s versus 6.86 s for the Bmw iX3. At this point, the ID.5 GTX leads by 0.62 s and sits roughly 11 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the ID.5 GTX is doing 128 km/h against 126 km/h for the Bmw iX3. The gap is 0.47 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the ID.5 GTX crosses the line in 14.53 s versus 15.07 s. The 0.54 s gap represents roughly 23 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the ID.5 GTX continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 175 km/h versus 172 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the ID.5 GTX finishes in 26.88 s versus 27.54 s, with a 0.66 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (180 vs 180 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the ID.5 GTX and the Bmw iX3 are governed to 180 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.33 kg/hp vs 7.64 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.53 seconds. The 0.62 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, ID.5 GTX gagne (6,24 s vs 6,86 s).
ID.5 GTX passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,24 secondes (simulation calibrée).
ID.5 GTX : 299 hp, ratio 7,33 kg/hp. iX3 G08 : 286 hp, ratio 7,64 kg/hp.
ID.5 GTX : 180 km/h. iX3 G08 : 180 km/h.