Among the 31 D-SUV electric 2021–2025, the ID.5 GTX ranks 22th of 30 in WLTP range (480 km, behind the Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology), 22th of 22 in DC charge power (135 kW, behind the Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology), 22th of 31 in 0–100 km/h (6.3 s, behind the Kia EV6 GT AWD).
ID.5 GTX
299 hp, 480 km range, 6,3 s 0-100 : among the 31 D-SUV electric 2021–2025, the ID.5 GTX ranks 22th of 30 in WLTP range, 22th of 22 in DC charge power, 22th of 31 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
299hp
460 Nm · 299 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
6.3s
VMax 180 km/h
Range
480km
WLTP
DC charging
135kW
Full specifications Volkswagen ID.5 GTX
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Puissance électrique | 299 hp |
| Combined power | 299 hp |
| Couple | 460 Nm |
| Gearbox | Mono-rapport Automatique |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Battery and charging
| Battery capacity | 77 kWh |
| Range WLTP | 480 km |
| Charge AC max | 11 kW |
| Charge DC max | 135 kW |
| Conso élec WLTP | 17.3 kWh/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 6,3 s |
| VMax | 180 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,584 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,766 mm |
| Width | 1,852 mm |
| Height | 1,627 mm |
| Kerb weight | 2,193 kg |
| Cd | 0.26 |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 31 D-SUV electric, the ID.5 GTX ranks (in the bottom third) in WLTP range. Caralogy simulates its real-world behaviour: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Long daily commute (>50 km/day) without range anxiety.
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
If the priority is WLTP range, the Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology (1st with 713 km) takes the lead. If the priority is DC charge power, the Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology (1st with 330 kW) takes the lead.
Real-world range: 480 km WLTP (22th of 30 in WLTP range)
The ID.5 GTX offers 480 km of WLTP range. The segment reference is the Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology (713 km).
Charging: 135 kW DC (22th of 22 in DC charge power)
The ID.5 GTX accepts up to 135 kW DC fast charging. The segment reference is the Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology (330 kW).
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Autonomie réelle
Simulez l’autonomie selon la vitesse, la température et le style.
Simuler l’autonomie →Where the ID.5 GTX stands against D-SUV electric
Comparison across 31 D-SUV electric marketed between 2021–2025.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Popular duels involving the ID.5 GTX
Volkswagen ID.5 GTX: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
480 km WLTP announced — making it the 22th of 30 in autonomie du segment out of 30 models. The reference is the Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology (713 km).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology leads in WLTP range (713 km vs 480 km). The choice depends on your priorities: check the ID.5 GTX vs Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.