Sur 0–100 km/h, EX40 Twin Motor AWD gagne (4,92 s vs 6,86 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| EX40 Twin Motor AWD | iX3 G08 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,92 s−1,94 s | 6,86 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,15 s−1,93 s | 15,08 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,14 s−2,40 s | 27,54 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,17 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,64 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | EX40 Twin Motor AWD | iX3 G08 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,60 s | 1,89 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,47 s | 3,16 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,74 s | 5,13 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,92 s | 6,86 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,42 s | 9,11 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,52 s | 16,42 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,15 s | 15,08 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,14 s | 27,54 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 408 hp | |
| Torque | 670 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 110 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction AWD |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp | |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 185 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | Automatic transmission, single-speed with fixed ratio |
Off the line, the EX40 Twin Motor AWD hits 100 km/h in 4.93 s versus 6.86 s for the Bmw iX3. At this point, the EX40 Twin Motor AWD leads by 1.94 s and sits roughly 16 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the EX40 Twin Motor AWD is doing 144 km/h against 126 km/h for the Bmw iX3. The gap is 1.26 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the EX40 Twin Motor AWD crosses the line in 13.14 s versus 15.07 s. The 1.93 s gap represents roughly 80 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the EX40 Twin Motor AWD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 180 km/h versus 172 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the EX40 Twin Motor AWD finishes in 25.14 s versus 27.54 s, with a 2.40 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (180 vs 180 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the EX40 Twin Motor AWD and the Bmw iX3 are governed to 180 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.17 kg/hp vs 7.64 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.53 seconds. The 1.94 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, EX40 Twin Motor AWD gagne (4,92 s vs 6,86 s).
EX40 Twin Motor AWD passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,92 secondes (simulation calibrée).
EX40 Twin Motor AWD : 408 hp, ratio 5,17 kg/hp. iX3 G08 : 286 hp, ratio 7,64 kg/hp.
EX40 Twin Motor AWD : 180 km/h. iX3 G08 : 180 km/h.