Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /SUV
AG6vsBQ6BEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsG6 · Q6

Xpeng G6 vs Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

family SUV · 2023 vs 2026 · Methodology
XpengBEVFaster

G6

480 hp · 660 Nm · 2,115 kg · 2023

VS
AudiBEV

Q6 Sportback e-tron

306 hp · 485 Nm · 2,200 kg · 2026

Result · 0–100 km/h

AXpeng G6

3.80 s

Gap3.02 sin favour of G6
BAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron

6.82 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureG6Q6 Sportback e-tronGap
0–100 km/h3.80 s6.82 s3.02 s · G6
400 m standing start12.03 s15.00 s2.97 s · G6
1,000 m standing start22.89 s27.04 s4.15 s · G6
Top speed (electronically limited)200 km/h210 km/h10 km/h · Q6 Sportback e-tron
Power-to-weight ratio4.41 kg/hp7.19 kg/hpbetter ratio · G6

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

XpengBEVG6
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
AudiBEVQ6 Sportback e-tron
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageG6Q6 Sportback e-tron
0–30 km/h1.06 s1.93 s
0–50 km/h1.76 s3.22 s
0–80 km/h2.86 s5.19 s
0–100 km/h3.80 s6.82 s
0–120 km/h5.01 s8.93 s
0–160 km/h8.63 s15.75 s
0–200 km/h13.99 s27.93 s
400 m standing start12.03 s15.00 s
1,000 m standing start22.89 s27.04 s
Top speed200 km/h210 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Xpeng

G6

4,41kg/hpratio better by 2,78 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power480 hpDual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor AWD
Torque660 Nm
Weight2 115 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
GearboxSingle-speed fixed gear
Audi

Q6 Sportback e-tron

7,19kg/hpcompensated by −85 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power306 hpPending
Torque485 Nm
Weight2 200 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainPropulsion
GearboxUnknown

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the G6 hits 100 km/h in 3.80 s versus 6.82 s for the Q6 Sportback e-tron. At this point, the G6 leads by 3.02 s and sits roughly 25 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the G6 is doing 152 km/h against 128 km/h for the Q6 Sportback e-tron. The gap is 2.16 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the G6 crosses the line in 12.03 s versus 15.00 s. The 2.97 s gap represents roughly 123 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the G6 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 200 km/h versus 175 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the G6 finishes in 22.89 s versus 27.04 s, with a 4.15 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (200 vs 210 km/h), preventing any comeback.

What the numbers don’t tell you

The G6 features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the Q6 Sportback e-tron’s RWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the G6 is capped at 200 km/h, the Q6 Sportback e-tron at 210 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.41 kg/hp vs 7.19 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.26 seconds. The 3.02 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Compare with other alternatives

Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.

Instead of G6
Tesla Model Y Long Range AWDTesla Model Y Long Range AWDTesla Model Y Long Range AWD

Other duels you might be interested in

XpengVSHyundai

G6 vs IONIQ 5 N

AudiVSTesla

Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Model Y Juniper RWD

FordVSXpeng

Mustang Mach-E GT vs G6

AudiVSBMW

Q6 Sportback e-tron vs iX3

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, G6 wins (3,80 s vs 6,82 s).

G6 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,80 seconds (calibrated simulation).

G6: 480 hp, ratio 4,41 kg/hp. Q6 Sportback e-tron: 306 hp, ratio 7,19 kg/hp.

G6: 200 km/h. Q6 Sportback e-tron: 210 km/h.