Sur 0–100 km/h, Terramar gagne (8,31 s vs 8,51 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| G9 | Terramar | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,51 s | 8,31 s+0,20 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,32 s | 16,25 s+0,07 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,71 s−0,70 s | 29,41 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 200 km/h | 214 km/h−14 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,18 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,00 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | G9 | Terramar |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,41 s | 2,27 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 4,03 s | 3,44 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 6,49 s | 6,00 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,51 s | 8,31 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,09 s | 11,46 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18,51 s | 20,91 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 31,05 s | 45,12 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,32 s | 16,25 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,71 s | 29,41 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 214 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 308 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 430 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 210 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 201 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 810 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed DSG |
Off the line, the Terramar hits 100 km/h in 8.31 s versus 8.51 s for the G9. At this point, the Terramar leads by 0.20 s and sits roughly 9 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Terramar is doing 116 km/h against 120 km/h for the G9. The gap is 0.28 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Terramar crosses the line in 16.25 s versus 16.32 s. The 0.07 s gap represents roughly 3 m of track — barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The G9 maxes out at 200 km/h while the Terramar keeps accelerating towards 214 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.16 s.
Around 461 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the G9 overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 14 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the G9 finishes in 28.71 s versus 29.41 s. The 0.70 s delta in favour of the G9 shows that top speed makes a clear difference.
Electronically capped at 200 km/h, the G9 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.18 kg/hp vs 9.00 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.30 seconds. The 0.20 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Terramar gagne (8,31 s vs 8,51 s).
G9 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 8,51 secondes (simulation calibrée).
G9 : 308 hp, ratio 7,18 kg/hp. Terramar : 201 hp, ratio 9,00 kg/hp.
G9 : 200 km/h. Terramar : 214 km/h.