Over 0–100 km/h, P7 wins (6,58 s vs 8,61 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | P7 | Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron 150 kW | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6.58 s | 8.61 s | 2.03 s · P7 |
| 400 m standing start | 14.81 s | 16.48 s | 1.67 s · P7 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27.64 s | 30.33 s | 2.69 s · P7 |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 170 km/h | 160 km/h | 10 km/h · P7 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7.59 kg/hp | 10.55 kg/hp | better ratio · P7 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | P7 | Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron 150 kW |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.75 s | 2.25 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2.93 s | 3.75 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4.84 s | 6.27 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6.58 s | 8.61 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8.81 s | 11.72 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15.66 s | 22.64 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14.81 s | 16.48 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27.64 s | 30.33 s |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 160 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 263 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 390 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 995 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 201 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 310 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 120 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
Off the line, the P7 hits 100 km/h in 6.58 s versus 8.61 s for the Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron 150 kW. At this point, the P7 leads by 2.03 s and sits roughly 20 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the P7 is doing 127 km/h against 115 km/h for the Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron 150 kW. The gap is 1.15 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the P7 crosses the line in 14.81 s versus 16.48 s. The 1.67 s gap represents roughly 64 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the P7 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 170 km/h versus 156 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the P7 finishes in 27.64 s versus 30.32 s, with a 2.68 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (170 vs 160 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the P7 is capped at 170 km/h, the Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron 150 kW at 160 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.59 kg/hp vs 10.55 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.73 seconds. The 2.03 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, P7 wins (6,58 s vs 8,61 s).
P7 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,58 seconds (calibrated simulation).
P7: 263 hp, ratio 7,59 kg/hp. Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron 150 kW: 201 hp, ratio 10,55 kg/hp.
P7: 170 km/h. Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron 150 kW: 160 km/h.