F48 · GENERATION 2021 · COMPACT SUV
BMWHEV

X1 sDrive18i

136 hp, 9,7 s 0-100 : among the 10 C-SUV hybrid 2019–2023, the X1 sDrive18i ranks 7th of 10 in Combined consumption, 8th of 9 in Tank range, 8th of 10 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,81815,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

136hp

220 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

9.7s

VMax 205 km/h

Cons.

6.0L

/100 km

Tank

51L

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW X1 sDrive18i

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Displacement1,499 cm³
Power136 hp
Couple220 Nm
GearboxManuelle 6 rapports Manuelle

Consumption

Cons. WLTP6.0 L/100km
Tank51 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h9,7 s
VMax205 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,447 mm
Wheelbase2,670 mm
Width1,821 mm
Height1,598 mm
Boot505 L
Kerb weight1,405 kg
Cd0.28
CO₂ WLTP138 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 10 C-SUV hybrid, the X1 sDrive18i ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage.

Less suitable for

Home charging access not leveraged. If you have a dedicated outlet, a PHEV would allow daily commutes in pure electric mode.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Kia Niro HEV FWD (1st with 4.8 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Renault Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 (1st with 1038 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 6.0 L/100 L/100 (7th of 10 in Combined consumption)

The X1 sDrive18i consumes 6.0 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Kia Niro HEV FWD (4.8 L/100).

Tank range: 850 km (8th of 9 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the X1 sDrive18i covers 850 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1038 km.

Segment positioning

Where the X1 sDrive18i stands against C-SUV hybrid

Comparison across 10 C-SUV hybrid marketed between 2019–2023.

Combined consumption7e / 10
6 L/100
Min 6.8 L/100 · Bmw X1 xDrive25iMax 4.8 L/100 · Kia Niro HEV FWD
Tank range8e / 9
850 km
Min 836 km · Bmw X1 sDrive20iMax 1 038 km · Renault Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200
0–100 km/h8e / 10
9,7 s
Min 11,0 s · Kia Niro HEV FWDMax 6,5 s · Bmw X1 xDrive25i

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW X1 F48 range

Generation F48 launched in 2015. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the F48

Compare

Popular duels involving the X1 sDrive18i

Frequently asked questions

BMW X1 sDrive18i: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 10 C-SUV hybrid 2019–2023, the X1 sDrive18i ranks 7th of 10 in Combined consumption (6.0 L/100, behind the Kia Niro HEV FWD), 8th of 9 in Tank range (850 km, behind the Renault Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200), 8th of 10 in 0–100 km/h (9.7 s, behind the Bmw X1 xDrive25i).

850 km on a full tank (6.0 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 8th of 9 in autonomie du segment.

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Kia Niro HEV FWD leads in Combined consumption (4.8 L/100 vs 6.0 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X1 sDrive18i vs Kia Niro HEV FWD duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.