Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /family SUV
AQ5PHEVvsBG9BEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsQ5 · G9

Audi Q5 SUV vs Xpeng G9

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

family SUV · 2025 vs 2022 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
AudiPHEVPlus rapide

Q5 SUV

367 ch · 20.7 kWh · 2025

VS
XpengBEV

G9

308 ch · 91 kWh · 2022

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start 100 % · mild weather

Result · total trip time

AAudi Q5 SUV

7h06charging included

1 stop · 162.03 €

Gap18 minin favour of Q5 SUV
BXpeng G9

7h24charging included

3 stops · 77.69 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureQ5 SUVG9Gap
Total time7h067h2418 min · Q5 SUV
Charging stops1 stop3 stops2 stops · Q5 SUV
Cost of energy used162.03 €77.69 €84.34 € · G9

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

AudiPHEVFastest
Q5 SUV
100%
Battery
100%
Fuel tank
553 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Refuel 1
5 min · +50 L · 107.41 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h06
1
Stops
7h06
Duration
162.03 €
Cost of energy used
XpengBEV
G9
100%
383 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
8 min · +36 kWh · 21.84 €
Charge 2
8 min · +36 kWh · 21.84 €
Charge 3
8 min · +36 kWh · 21.89 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h24
3
Stops
7h24
Duration
77.69 €
Cost of energy used

The 18-minute lead of the Q5 SUV does not come from driving speed, but from 2 fewer charging stops on this route (1 vs 3).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: 1 stop of 5 min for the Q5 SUV versus 3 stops totalling 23 min for the G9.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (25,2 kWh/100km for Q5 SUV and 19,0 kWh/100km for G9) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 10,5 L/100km (Q5 SUV) and 23,8 kWh/100km (G9). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

For reference: how much would an equivalent petrol car cost?

A Peugeot 3008 1.2 PureTech 130 (equivalent segment) consumes about 7,8 L/100km on the motorway at 130 km/h. At 1,9 €/L, this Paris → Marseille trip would cost ~112 €. That is 0,7× the electric cost of the Q5 SUV and 1,4× that of the G9. The gap narrows in winter but never reverses.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

Audi Q5 SUV

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Valence, A7initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh82 km21 kWh consumed0.050 €/km4.13 €
Paris → Valence, A7fuel · 2.17 €/L471 km50 L consumed0.228 €/km107.41 €
Valence, A7 → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L222 km23 L consumed0.227 €/km50.49 €
Trip total162.03 €

Xpeng G9

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Tournus, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh345 km82 kWh consumed0.048 €/km16.39 €
Tournus, A6 → Valence, A7energy charged at Ionity 273 kW · 0.60 €/kWh153 km36 kWh consumed0.143 €/km21.84 €
Valence, A7 → Manosque, A51energy charged at Ionity 273 kW · 0.60 €/kWh153 km36 kWh consumed0.143 €/km21.84 €
Manosque, A51 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 274 kW · 0.60 €/kWh124 km29 kWh consumed0.142 €/km17.62 €
Trip total77.69 €

Range recovered by stop duration

How many kilometres do you recover depending on the time spent at the charger? Comparison at nominal peak power.
Charging stop durationAudi Q5 SUVXpeng G9
5 minutes-~74 km
10 minutes-~147 km
20 minutes-~295 km
Full session 10 → 80 %-~268 km · 20 min

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
25.2 kWh/100 km · 19.0 kWh/100 km
Net battery
20.7 kWh · 91 kWh

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

AudiPHEV

Q5 SUV

367 ch · 20.7 kWh · 2025

XpengBEV

G9

308 ch · 91 kWh · 2022

Other duels you might be interested in

JaguarVSAudi

F-PACE P400e vs Q5 SUV

BMWVSXpeng

iX xDrive40 vs G9

AudiVSBMW

Q5 SUV vs X3 xDrive30e

BMWVSXpeng

iX xDrive50 vs G9

Frequently asked questions

The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the Q5 SUV arrives in 7h06 with 1 stop.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 162.03 € (Q5 SUV) and 77.69 € (G9). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 3008 1.2 PureTech 130 (~7.8 L/100 km) would cost about 112 € in fuel.