Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /grand tourer
AS6BEVvsB320ePHEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsS6 · 320e

Audi S6 Sportback e-tron vs BMW 320e G20

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

grand tourer · 2026 vs 2021 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
AudiBEV

S6 Sportback e-tron

543 ch · 94.4 kWh · 2026

VS
BMWPHEVPlus rapide

320e G20

204 ch · 11.2 kWh · 2021

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start 100 % · mild weather

Result · total trip time

AAudi S6 Sportback e-tron

7h33charging included

2 stops · 56.56 €

Gap27 minin favour of 320e
BBMW 320e G20

7h06charging included

1 stop · 152.16 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureS6 Sportback e-tron320e G20Gap
Total time7h337h0627 min · 320e G20
Charging stops2 stops1 stop1 stop · 320e G20
Cost of energy used56.56 €152.16 €95.60 € · S6 Sportback e-tron

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

AudiBEV
S6 Sportback e-tron
100%
485 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
17 min · +38 kWh · 22.66 €
Charge 2
15 min · +34 kWh · 20.41 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h33
2
Stops
7h33
Duration
56.56 €
Cost of energy used
BMWPHEVFastest
320e G20
100%
Battery
100%
Fuel tank
295 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Refuel 1
5 min · +36 L · 78.12 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h06
1
Stops
7h06
Duration
152.16 €
Cost of energy used

The 27-minute lead of the 320e G20 does not come from driving speed, but from one fewer charging stop on this route (1 vs 2).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: 1 stop of 5 min for the 320e G20 versus 2 stops totalling 32 min for the S6 Sportback e-tron.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (16,5 kWh/100km for S6 Sportback e-tron and 14,8 kWh/100km for 320e G20) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 19,5 kWh/100km (S6 Sportback e-tron) and 9,6 L/100km (320e G20). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

For reference: how much would an equivalent petrol car cost?

A BMW 530i (equivalent segment) consumes about 8,0 L/100km on the motorway at 130 km/h. At 1,9 €/L, this Paris → Marseille trip would cost ~115 €. That is 2,0× the electric cost of the S6 Sportback e-tron and 0,8× that of the 320e G20. The gap narrows in winter but never reverses.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

Audi S6 Sportback e-tron

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Limonest, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh436 km85 kWh consumed0.039 €/km17.00 €
Limonest, A6 → Montélimar, A7energy charged at Ionity 133 kW · 0.60 €/kWh194 km38 kWh consumed0.117 €/km22.66 €
Montélimar, A7 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 136 kW · 0.60 €/kWh145 km28 kWh consumed0.117 €/km16.90 €
Trip total56.56 €

BMW 320e G20

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Limonest, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh52 km8 kWh consumed0.030 €/km1.54 €
Paris → Limonest, A6fuel · 2.17 €/L375 km36 L consumed0.208 €/km78.12 €
Limonest, A6 → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L348 km33 L consumed0.208 €/km72.50 €
Trip total152.16 €

Range recovered by stop duration

How many kilometres do you recover depending on the time spent at the charger? Comparison at nominal peak power.
Charging stop durationAudi S6 Sportback e-tronBMW 320e G20
5 minutes--
10 minutes--
20 minutes--
Full session 10 → 80 %--

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
16.5 kWh/100 km · 14.8 kWh/100 km
Net battery
94.4 kWh · 11.2 kWh

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

AudiBEV

S6 Sportback e-tron

543 ch · 94.4 kWh · 2026

BMWPHEV

320e G20

204 ch · 11.2 kWh · 2021

Other duels you might be interested in

AudiVSPorsche

S6 Sportback e-tron vs Taycan 4S

VolvoVSBMW

V60 B5 AWD Geartronic vs 320e

PorscheVSAudi

Taycan 4S Cross Turismo vs S6 Sportback e-tron

AudiVSBMW

A5 Avant e-hybrid quattro 220 kW vs 320e

Frequently asked questions

The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the 320e G20 arrives in 7h06 with 1 stop.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 56.56 € (S6 Sportback e-tron) and 152.16 € (320e G20). For reference, an equivalent BMW 530i (~8.0 L/100 km) would cost about 115 € in fuel.