AudiBEV
S6 Sportback e-tron
543 ch · 94.4 kWh · 2026
Motorway range comparison
Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.
Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
| S6 Sportback e-tron | M240i F44 | |
|---|---|---|
| Total time | 7h33 | 7h01−32 min |
| Charging stops | 2 stops | 0 stops−2 stops |
| Total cost | 47,51 €−46,42 € | 93,93 € |
Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.
Analysis
Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The M240i F44 (combustion) makes no stop, the S6 Sportback e-tron (electric) 2 stops totalling 32 min. Road safety reminder: on a trip of this duration, it is recommended to stop for at least 51 min total (17 min every 2h). The energy cost is 47,51 € for S6 Sportback e-tron versus 93,93 € for M240i F44.
The official WLTP figures (16,5 kWh/100km for S6 Sportback e-tron and 7,3 L/100km for M240i F44) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily — it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve — not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 19,5 kWh/100km (S6 Sportback e-tron) and 6,0 L/100km (M240i F44). Full methodology: see the dedicated button above the summary.
On a 200 km round trip (e.g. a weekend getaway), the electric or plug-in hybrid vehicle completes the entire journey on home energy at 0.18 €/kWh — with no charging stop. The time advantage of the combustion car on long-distance motorways disappears entirely, and the economic advantage of electric strengthens considerably.
The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment — based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.
| Segment | Distance | €/km | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paris → Limonest, A6initial energy charged at home · 0,21 €/kWh | 436 km85 kWh consumed | 0,041 €/km | 17,84 € |
| Limonest, A6 → Montélimar, A7energy charged at Ionity 133 kW · 0,45 €/kWh | 194 km38 kWh consumed | 0,088 €/km | 16,99 € |
| Montélimar, A7 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 136 kW · 0,45 €/kWh | 145 km28 kWh consumed | 0,087 €/km | 12,68 € |
| Trip total | 47,51 € | ||
| Segment | Distance | €/km | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paris → Marseillefuel · 2,02 €/L | 775 km47 L consumed | 0,121 €/km | 93,93 € |
| Trip total | 93,93 € | ||
How many kilometres do you recover depending on the time spent at the charger? Comparison at nominal peak power.
| Charging stop duration | Audi S6 Sportback e-tron | BMW M240i F44 |
|---|---|---|
| 5 minutes | — | — |
| 10 minutes | — | — |
| 20 minutes | — | — |
| Full session 10 → 80 % | — | — |
Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment
543 ch · 94.4 kWh · 2026
340 ch · 2020
The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the M240i F44 arrives in 7h01 with 0 charging stop.
WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.
Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.
No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.
Electric: 47,51 € (S6 Sportback e-tron) and 93,93 € (M240i F44). An equivalent petrol SUV (~8 L/100 km) would cost about 115 € in motorway fuel. Electric costs less in energy but adds charging stops.