Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /grand tourer
Ai5vsBSealBEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • Specsi5 · Seal

BMW i5 eDrive40 G60 vs BYD Seal 313 2WD

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

grand tourer · 2025 vs 2022 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
BMWBEVPlus rapide

i5 eDrive40 G60

313 ch · 74.8 kWh · 2025

VS
BYDBEV

Seal 313 2WD

313 ch · 80 kWh · 2022

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start 100 % · mild weather

Result · total trip time

ABMW i5 eDrive40 G60

7h22charging included

2 stops · 49.80 €

Gap15 minin favour of i5 eDrive40
BBYD Seal 313 2WD

7h37charging included

2 stops · 51.65 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
Measurei5 eDrive40 G60Seal 313 2WDGap
Total time7h227h3715 min · i5 eDrive40 G60
Charging stops2 stops2 stopsSame
Cost of energy used49.80 €51.65 €1.85 € · i5 eDrive40 G60

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

BMWBEVFastest
i5 eDrive40 G60
100%
453 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
9 min · +30 kWh · 17.95 €
Charge 2
12 min · +36 kWh · 21.35 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h22
2
Stops
7h22
Duration
49.80 €
Cost of energy used
BYDBEV
Seal 313 2WD
100%
462 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
17 min · +32 kWh · 19.20 €
Charge 2
19 min · +35 kWh · 21.16 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h37
2
Stops
7h37
Duration
51.65 €
Cost of energy used

The 15-minute lead of the i5 eDrive40 G60 does not come from driving speed, but from shorter stops on this route (21 min vs 36 min).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: 2 stops totalling 21 min for the i5 eDrive40 G60 versus 2 stops totalling 36 min for the Seal 313 2WD.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (18,0 kWh/100km for i5 eDrive40 G60 and 16,0 kWh/100km for Seal 313 2WD) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 16,5 kWh/100km (i5 eDrive40 G60) and 17,3 kWh/100km (Seal 313 2WD). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Recovery speed: 18,9 km/min versus 10,8 km/min

During the 21 minutes of charging for the i5 eDrive40 G60, range recovers by 397 km. During the 36 cumulative minutes for the Seal 313 2WD, range recovers by 389 km. Per minute: the i5 eDrive40 G60 recovers 1,8× faster. At this rate, the charging stop blends into the trip rhythm - just enough time for a coffee. At a lower rate, it dictates the pace.

For reference: how much would an equivalent petrol car cost?

A BMW 530i (equivalent segment) consumes about 8,0 L/100km on the motorway at 130 km/h. At 1,9 €/L, this Paris → Marseille trip would cost ~115 €. That is 2,3× the electric cost of the i5 eDrive40 G60 and 2,2× that of the Seal 313 2WD. The gap narrows in winter but never reverses.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

BMW i5 eDrive40 G60

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Limonest, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh408 km67 kWh consumed0.033 €/km13.47 €
Limonest, A6 → Montélimar, A7energy charged at Ionity 199 kW · 0.60 €/kWh181 km30 kWh consumed0.099 €/km17.95 €
Montélimar, A7 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 178 kW · 0.60 €/kWh186 km31 kWh consumed0.099 €/km18.38 €
Trip total49.80 €

BYD Seal 313 2WD

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Limonest, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh416 km72 kWh consumed0.035 €/km14.41 €
Limonest, A6 → Montélimar, A7energy charged at Ionity 113 kW · 0.60 €/kWh185 km32 kWh consumed0.104 €/km19.20 €
Montélimar, A7 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 111 kW · 0.60 €/kWh174 km30 kWh consumed0.104 €/km18.05 €
Trip total51.65 €

Range recovered by stop duration

How many kilometres do you recover depending on the time spent at the charger? Comparison at nominal peak power.
Charging stop durationBMW i5 eDrive40 G60BYD Seal 313 2WD
5 minutes~72 km-
10 minutes~145 km-
20 minutes~290 km-
Full session 10 → 80 %~317 km · 24 min-

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
18.0 kWh/100 km · 16.0 kWh/100 km
Net battery
74.8 kWh · 80 kWh

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

BMWBEV

i5 eDrive40 G60

313 ch · 74.8 kWh · 2025

BYDBEV

Seal 313 2WD

313 ch · 80 kWh · 2022

Other duels you might be interested in

BMWVSAudi

i5 eDrive40 vs A6 Avant e-tron

BYDVSBMW

Seal 313 2WD vs i4 eDrive35

TeslaVSBMW

Model S 85 vs i5 eDrive40

BYDVSTesla

Seal 313 2WD vs Model 3 RWD

Frequently asked questions

The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the i5 eDrive40 G60 arrives in 7h22 with 2 charging stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 49.80 € (i5 eDrive40 G60) and 51.65 € (Seal 313 2WD). For reference, an equivalent BMW 530i (~8.0 L/100 km) would cost about 115 € in fuel.