Over 0–100 km/h, Seal 313 2WD wins (6,00 s vs 6,12 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| i5 eDrive40 G60 | Seal 313 2WD | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,12 s | 6,00 s+0,12 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,30 s | 14,21 s+0,09 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,87 s−0,45 s | 26,32 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 193 km/h+13 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,81 kg/hp | 6,35 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | i5 eDrive40 G60 | Seal 313 2WD |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,79 s | 1,74 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,98 s | 2,90 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,78 s | 4,66 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,12 s | 6,00 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,84 s | 7,72 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 13,27 s | 13,20 stight gap |
| 400 m standing start | 14,30 s | 14,21 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,87 s | 26,32 s |
| Top speed | 193 km/h | 180 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 313 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 130 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Automatic transmission, single-stage with fixed ratio |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 313 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 360 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 988 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
Off the line, the Seal 313 2WD hits 100 km/h in 6.00 s versus 6.12 s for the Bmw i5 eDrive40. At this point, the Seal 313 2WD leads by 0.12 s and sits roughly 2 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Seal 313 2WD is doing 135 km/h against 135 km/h for the Bmw i5 eDrive40. The gap is 0.09 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Seal 313 2WD crosses the line in 14.21 s versus 14.29 s. The 0.09 s gap represents roughly 4 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The Seal 313 2WD maxes out at 180 km/h while the Bmw i5 eDrive40 keeps accelerating towards 193 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.06 s.
Around 668 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the Bmw i5 eDrive40 overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 13 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the Bmw i5 eDrive40 finishes in 25.87 s versus 26.31 s. The 0.45 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw i5 eDrive40 is capped at 193 km/h, the Seal 313 2WD at 180 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.81 kg/hp vs 6.35 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.92 seconds. The 0.12 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Seal 313 2WD wins (6,00 s vs 6,12 s).
i5 eDrive40 G60 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,12 seconds (calibrated simulation).
i5 eDrive40 G60: 313 hp, ratio 6,81 kg/hp. Seal 313 2WD: 313 hp, ratio 6,35 kg/hp.
i5 eDrive40 G60: 193 km/h. Seal 313 2WD: 180 km/h.