Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /grand tourer
Ai5vsBP7BEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • Specsi5 · P7

BMW i5 eDrive40 G60 vs Xpeng P7

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

grand tourer · 2025 vs 2020 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
BMWBEVPlus rapide

i5 eDrive40 G60

313 ch · 74.8 kWh · 2025

VS
XpengBEV

P7

263 ch · 75 kWh · 2020

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start 100 % · mild weather

Result · total trip time

ABMW i5 eDrive40 G60

7h22charging included

2 stops · 49.80 €

Gap55 minin favour of i5 eDrive40
BXpeng P7

8h17charging included

3 stops · 66.75 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
Measurei5 eDrive40 G60P7Gap
Total time7h228h1755 min · i5 eDrive40 G60
Charging stops2 stops3 stops1 stop · i5 eDrive40 G60
Cost of energy used49.80 €66.75 €16.95 € · i5 eDrive40 G60

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

BMWBEVFastest
i5 eDrive40 G60
100%
453 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
9 min · +30 kWh · 17.95 €
Charge 2
12 min · +36 kWh · 21.35 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h22
2
Stops
7h22
Duration
49.80 €
Cost of energy used
XpengBEV
P7
100%
372 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
24 min · +30 kWh · 18.00 €
Charge 2
24 min · +30 kWh · 18.00 €
Charge 3
29 min · +35 kWh · 20.87 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 8h17
3
Stops
8h17
Duration
66.75 €
Cost of energy used

The 55-minute lead of the i5 eDrive40 G60 does not come from driving speed, but from one fewer charging stop on this route (2 vs 3).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: 2 stops totalling 21 min for the i5 eDrive40 G60 versus 3 stops totalling 76 min for the P7.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (18,0 kWh/100km for i5 eDrive40 G60 and 16,8 kWh/100km for P7) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 16,5 kWh/100km (i5 eDrive40 G60) and 20,2 kWh/100km (P7). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Recovery speed: 18,9 km/min versus 6,2 km/min

During the 21 minutes of charging for the i5 eDrive40 G60, range recovers by 397 km. During the 76 cumulative minutes for the P7, range recovers by 469 km. Per minute: the i5 eDrive40 G60 recovers 3,0× faster. At this rate, the charging stop blends into the trip rhythm - just enough time for a coffee. At a lower rate, it dictates the pace.

For reference: how much would an equivalent petrol car cost?

A BMW 530i (equivalent segment) consumes about 8,0 L/100km on the motorway at 130 km/h. At 1,9 €/L, this Paris → Marseille trip would cost ~115 €. That is 2,3× the electric cost of the i5 eDrive40 G60 and 1,7× that of the P7. The gap narrows in winter but never reverses.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

BMW i5 eDrive40 G60

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Limonest, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh408 km67 kWh consumed0.033 €/km13.47 €
Limonest, A6 → Montélimar, A7energy charged at Ionity 199 kW · 0.60 €/kWh181 km30 kWh consumed0.099 €/km17.95 €
Montélimar, A7 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 178 kW · 0.60 €/kWh186 km31 kWh consumed0.099 €/km18.38 €
Trip total49.80 €

Xpeng P7

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Tournus, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh335 km68 kWh consumed0.040 €/km13.51 €
Tournus, A6 → Valence, A7energy charged at Ionity 75 kW · 0.60 €/kWh149 km30 kWh consumed0.121 €/km18.00 €
Valence, A7 → Montélimar, A7energy charged at Ionity 75 kW · 0.60 €/kWh149 km30 kWh consumed0.121 €/km18.00 €
Montélimar, A7 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 72 kW · 0.60 €/kWh143 km29 kWh consumed0.121 €/km17.24 €
Trip total66.75 €

Range recovered by stop duration

How many kilometres do you recover depending on the time spent at the charger? Comparison at nominal peak power.
Charging stop durationBMW i5 eDrive40 G60Xpeng P7
5 minutes~72 km~23 km
10 minutes~145 km~46 km
20 minutes~290 km~93 km
Full session 10 → 80 %~317 km · 24 min~260 km · 61 min

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
18.0 kWh/100 km · 16.8 kWh/100 km
Net battery
74.8 kWh · 75 kWh
Max DC charging
205 kW · 80 kW

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

BMWBEV

i5 eDrive40 G60

313 ch · 74.8 kWh · 2025

XpengBEV

P7

263 ch · 75 kWh · 2020

Other duels you might be interested in

BMWVSAudi

i5 eDrive40 vs A6 Avant e-tron

XpengVSTesla

P7 vs Model 3 Long Range RWD

TeslaVSBMW

Model S 85 vs i5 eDrive40

TeslaVSXpeng

Model 3 RWD vs P7

Frequently asked questions

The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the i5 eDrive40 G60 arrives in 7h22 with 2 charging stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 49.80 € (i5 eDrive40 G60) and 66.75 € (P7). For reference, an equivalent BMW 530i (~8.0 L/100 km) would cost about 115 € in fuel.