Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /saloon
AM4vsBA3Petrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsM4 · A3

BMW M4 G82 vs Audi A3 Sedan

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

saloon · 2024 vs 2026 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
BMWPetrol

M4 G82

480 ch · 2024

VS
AudiPetrolPlus rapide

A3 Sedan

150 ch · 2026

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start réservoir plein · mild weather

Result · total trip time

ABMW M4 G82

7h06charging included

1 stop · 169.86 €

Gap5 minin favour of A3 Sedan
BAudi A3 Sedan

7h01no stop

0 stops · 90.81 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureM4 G82A3 SedanGap
Total time7h067h015 min · A3 Sedan
Charging stops1 stop0 stops1 stop · A3 Sedan
Cost of energy used169.86 €90.81 €79.05 € · A3 Sedan

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

BMWPetrol
M4 G82
100%
526 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Refuel 1
5 min · +53 L · 115.23 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h06
1
Stops
7h06
Duration
169.86 €
Cost of energy used
AudiPetrolFastest
A3 Sedan
100%
926 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h01
0
Stops
7h01
Duration
90.81 €
Cost of energy used

The 5-minute lead of the A3 Sedan does not come from driving speed, but from one fewer charging stop on this route (0 vs 1).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: no stop for the A3 Sedan versus 1 stop of 5 min for the M4 G82.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (10,1 L/100km for M4 G82 and 6,0 L/100km for A3 Sedan) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 10,1 L/100km (M4 G82) and 5,4 L/100km (A3 Sedan). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

BMW M4 G82

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Valence, A7fuel · 2.17 €/L526 km53 L consumed0.219 €/km115.23 €
Valence, A7 → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L249 km25 L consumed0.219 €/km54.63 €
Trip total169.86 €

Audi A3 Sedan

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L775 km42 L consumed0.117 €/km90.81 €
Trip total90.81 €

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
10.1 L/100 km · 6.0 L/100 km
Fuel tank
59 L · 50 L

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

BMWPetrol

M4 G82

480 ch · 2024

AudiPetrol

A3 Sedan

150 ch · 2026

Other duels you might be interested in

BMWVSAudi

M4 vs S5 Avant

BMWVSAudi

218i Coupé vs A3 Sedan

BMWVSAudi

M4 vs S5 Sedan

AudiVSBMW

A3 Sedan vs 118i

Frequently asked questions

On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the A3 Sedan arrives in 7h01 with 0 fuel stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 169.86 € (M4 G82) and 90.81 € (A3 Sedan). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 508 1.6 PureTech 180 (~7.2 L/100 km) would cost about 103 € in fuel.