Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /family SUV
AX4vsBExplorerPetrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsX4 · Explorer

BMW X4 M Competition G02 vs Ford Explorer ST 400

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

family SUV · 2021 vs 2020 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
BMWPetrol

X4 M Competition G02

510 ch · 2021

VS
FordPetrol

Explorer ST 400

405 ch · 2020

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start réservoir plein · mild weather

Result · total trip time

ABMW X4 M Competition G02

7h06charging included

1 stop · 146.31 €

GapLess than a minute apart
BFord Explorer ST 400

7h06charging included

1 stop · 158.08 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureX4 M Competition G02Explorer ST 400Gap
Total time7h067h06Less than a minute apart
Charging stops1 stop1 stopSame
Cost of energy used146.31 €158.08 €11.77 € · X4 M Competition G02

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

BMWPetrol
X4 M Competition G02
100%
672 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Refuel 1
5 min · +59 L · 126.94 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h06
1
Stops
7h06
Duration
146.31 €
Cost of energy used
FordPetrol
Explorer ST 400
100%
737 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Refuel 1
5 min · +69 L · 150.38 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h06
1
Stops
7h06
Duration
158.08 €
Cost of energy used

Very close result: less than one minute apart on this route. Both vehicles are evenly matched on the motorway over this distance.

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: 1 stop of 5 min for the X4 M Competition G02 versus 1 stop of 5 min for the Explorer ST 400.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (10,9 L/100km for X4 M Competition G02 and 11,8 L/100km for Explorer ST 400) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 8,7 L/100km (X4 M Competition G02) and 9,4 L/100km (Explorer ST 400). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

BMW X4 M Competition G02

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Manosque, A51fuel · 2.17 €/L672 km59 L consumed0.189 €/km126.95 €
Manosque, A51 → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L103 km9 L consumed0.188 €/km19.37 €
Trip total146.31 €

Ford Explorer ST 400

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Aix-en-Provence, A7fuel · 2.17 €/L737 km69 L consumed0.204 €/km150.38 €
Aix-en-Provence, A7 → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L38 km4 L consumed0.203 €/km7.70 €
Trip total158.08 €

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
10.9 L/100 km · 11.8 L/100 km
Fuel tank
65 L · 77 L

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

BMWPetrol

X4 M Competition G02

510 ch · 2021

FordPetrol

Explorer ST 400

405 ch · 2020

Other duels you might be interested in

JaguarVSBMW

F-PACE SVR vs X4 M Competition

BMWVSPorsche

X4 M Competition vs Macan Turbo with Performance Package

BMWVSPorsche

X4 M Competition vs Macan Turbo

BMWVSPorsche

X4 M Competition vs Macan Turbo

Frequently asked questions

On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the X4 M Competition G02 arrives in 7h06 with 1 fuel stop.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 146.31 € (X4 M Competition G02) and 158.08 € (Explorer ST 400). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 3008 1.2 PureTech 130 (~7.8 L/100 km) would cost about 112 € in fuel.