Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /large SUV
AX5DieselvsB220iPetrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsX5 · 220i

BMW X5 M50d F15 vs BMW 220i Convertible F44

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

large SUV · 2018 vs 2021 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
BMWDiesel

X5 M50d F15

400 ch · 2018

VS
BMWPetrol

220i Convertible F44

184 ch · 2021

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start réservoir plein · mild weather

Result · total trip time

ABMW X5 M50d F15

7h01no stop

0 stops · 112.68 €

GapLess than a minute apart
BBMW 220i Convertible F44

7h01no stop

0 stops · 95.86 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureX5 M50d F15220i Convertible F44Gap
Total time7h017h01Less than a minute apart
Charging stops0 stops0 stopsSame
Cost of energy used112.68 €95.86 €16.82 € · 220i Convertible F44

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

BMWDiesel
X5 M50d F15
100%
1194 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h01
0
Stops
7h01
Duration
112.68 €
Cost of energy used
BMWPetrol
220i Convertible F44
100%
912 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h01
0
Stops
7h01
Duration
95.86 €
Cost of energy used

Very close result: less than one minute apart on this route. Both vehicles are evenly matched on the motorway over this distance.

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: no stop for the X5 M50d F15 versus no stop for the 220i Convertible F44.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (7,2 L/100km for X5 M50d F15 and 6,4 L/100km for 220i Convertible F44) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 6,7 L/100km (X5 M50d F15) and 5,7 L/100km (220i Convertible F44). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

BMW X5 M50d F15

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L775 km52 L consumed0.145 €/km112.68 €
Trip total112.68 €

BMW 220i Convertible F44

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L775 km44 L consumed0.124 €/km95.86 €
Trip total95.86 €

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
7.2 L/100 km · 6.4 L/100 km
Fuel tank
80 L · 52 L

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

BMWDiesel

X5 M50d F15

400 ch · 2018

BMWPetrol

220i Convertible F44

184 ch · 2021

Other duels you might be interested in

BMWVSAudi

X5 M50d vs Q7 SUV

AudiVSBMW

A3 allstreet vs 220i Convertible

BMWVSAudi

X5 M50d vs Q7 SUV

AudiVSBMW

A3 Sedan vs 220i Convertible

Frequently asked questions

On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the X5 M50d F15 arrives in 7h01 with 0 fuel stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 112.68 € (X5 M50d F15) and 95.86 € (220i Convertible F44). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 3008 1.2 PureTech 130 (~7.8 L/100 km) would cost about 112 € in fuel.