Among the 107 compacts 2019–2023, the 220i Convertible ranks 75th of 103 in Combined consumption (6.4 L/100, behind the Bmw 216d Steptronic), 59th of 95 in Tank range (813 km, behind the Bmw 216d Steptronic), 54th of 107 in 0–100 km/h (7.7 s, behind the BMW M2).
F44 · GENERATION 2021 → · COMPACT
BMWICE
220i Convertible
184 hp, 7,7 s 0-100 : among the 107 compacts 2019–2023, the 220i Convertible ranks 75th of 103 in Combined consumption, 59th of 95 in Tank range, 54th of 107 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
184hp
270 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
7.7s
VMax 226 km/h
Cons.
6.4L
/100 km
Tank
52L
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW 220i Convertible
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | 4 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,998 cm³ |
| Power | 184 hp |
| Couple | 270 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 6.4 L/100km |
| Tank | 52 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 7,7 s |
| VMax | 226 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,432 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,690 mm |
| Width | 1,774 mm |
| Height | 1,413 mm |
| Boot | 280 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,580 kg |
| Cd | 0.32 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 147 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 107 compacts, the 220i Convertible ranks (in the bottom third) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Fuel consumption: 6.4 L/100 L/100 (75th of 103 in Combined consumption)
The 220i Convertible consumes 6.4 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 216d Steptronic (3.9 L/100).
Tank range: 813 km (59th of 95 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 220i Convertible covers 813 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1308 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the 220i Convertible stands against compacts
Comparison across 107 compacts marketed between 2019–2023.
Combined consumption75e / 103
6.4 L/100
Min 10 L/100 · BMW M2Max 3.9 L/100 · Bmw 216d Steptronic
Tank range59e / 95
813 km
Min 520 km · BMW M2Max 1 308 km · Bmw 216d Steptronic
0–100 km/h54e / 107
7,7 s
Min 12,3 s · Hyundai i30 1.5 DPi 110 PSMax 4,1 s · BMW M2
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
A3 allstreet204 hp · 0-100 6.4 s
A3 Sedan204 hp · 0-100 6.3 s
A3 Sportback TFSI quattro S tronic 150 kW204 hp · 0-100 6.3 s
A3 allstreet150 hp · 0-100 8.4 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full BMW 2 Series F44 range
Generation F44 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the F44
Compare
Popular duels involving the 220i Convertible
Frequently asked questions
BMW 220i Convertible: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
813 km on a full tank (6.4 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 59th of 95 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw 216d Steptronic leads in Combined consumption (3.9 L/100 vs 6.4 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 220i Convertible vs Bmw 216d Steptronic duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.