Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /large SUV
AX5PetrolvsBAustralHybrid
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsX5 · Austral

BMW X5 M50i G05 vs Renault Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

large SUV · 2019 vs 2022 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
BMWPetrolPlus rapide

X5 M50i G05

530 ch · 2019

VS
RenaultHybrid

Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200

200 ch · 2022

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start réservoir plein · mild weather

Result · total trip time

ABMW X5 M50i G05

7h01no stop

0 stops · 146.31 €

Gap5 minin favour of X5 M50i
BRenault Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200

7h06charging included

1 stop · 111.42 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureX5 M50i G05Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200Gap
Total time7h017h065 min · X5 M50i G05
Charging stops0 stops1 stop1 stop · X5 M50i G05
Cost of energy used146.31 €111.42 €34.89 € · Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

BMWPetrolFastest
X5 M50i G05
100%
954 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h01
0
Stops
7h01
Duration
146.31 €
Cost of energy used
RenaultHybrid
Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200
100%
747 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Refuel 1
5 min · +50 L · 107.41 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h06
1
Stops
7h06
Duration
111.42 €
Cost of energy used

The 5-minute lead of the X5 M50i G05 does not come from driving speed, but from one fewer charging stop on this route (0 vs 1).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: no stop for the X5 M50i G05 versus 1 stop of 5 min for the Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (10,7 L/100km for X5 M50i G05 and 5,3 L/100km for Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 8,7 L/100km (X5 M50i G05) and 6,6 L/100km (Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

BMW X5 M50i G05

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L775 km67 L consumed0.189 €/km146.31 €
Trip total146.31 €

Renault Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Aix-en-Provence, A7fuel · 2.17 €/L747 km50 L consumed0.144 €/km107.41 €
Aix-en-Provence, A7 → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L28 km2 L consumed0.143 €/km4.00 €
Trip total111.42 €

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
10.7 L/100 km · 5.3 L/100 km
Fuel tank
83 L · 55 L

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

BMWPetrol

X5 M50i G05

530 ch · 2019

RenaultHybrid

Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200

200 ch · 2022

Other duels you might be interested in

BMWVSPorsche

X5 M50i vs Cayenne Turbo

RenaultVSJeep

Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 vs Compass 4xe

BMWVSPorsche

X5 M50i vs Cayenne Turbo

BMWVSRenault

X1 xDrive25e vs Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200

Frequently asked questions

On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the X5 M50i G05 arrives in 7h01 with 0 fuel stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 146.31 € (X5 M50i G05) and 111.42 € (Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 3008 1.2 PureTech 130 (~7.8 L/100 km) would cost about 112 € in fuel.