G05 · GENERATION 2019 · LARGE SUV
BMWICE

X5 M50i

530 hp, 4,3 s 0-100 : among the 22 E-SUV 2017–2021, the X5 M50i ranks 6th of 22 in 0–100 km/h, 9th of 22 in Top speed, 5th of 22 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate3,24215,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

530hp

750 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

4.3s

VMax 250 km/h

Cons.

10.7L

/100 km

Tank

83L

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW X5 M50i

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Displacement4,395 cm³
Power530 hp
Couple750 Nm
GearboxConvertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique

Consumption

Cons. WLTP10.7 L/100km
Tank83 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h4,3 s
VMax250 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,922 mm
Wheelbase2,975 mm
Width2,004 mm
Height1,745 mm
Boot650 L
Kerb weight2,250 kg
Cd0.35
CO₂ WLTP243 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 22 E-SUV, the X5 M50i ranks (top 6 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 6th of 22 in 0–100 km/h (4.3 s), 5th of 22 in Power-to-weight (236 hp/t). 6th of 22 in 0–100 km/h (4.3 s), 5th of 22 in Power-to-weight (236 hp/t).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 10,7 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Bmw X5 M Competition (1st with 3.8 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe (1st with 285 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 4.3 s 0-100 (6th of 22 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the X5 M50i ranks 6th of 22 in 0–100 km/h, 0.5 s off the reference Bmw X5 M Competition (3.8 s).

Top speed: 250 km/h (9th of 22 in Top speed)

Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 285 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the X5 M50i stands against E-SUV

Comparison across 22 E-SUV marketed between 2017–2021.

0–100 km/h6e / 22
4,3 s
Min 6,8 s · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300Max 3,8 s · Bmw X5 M Competition
Top speed9e / 22
250 km/h
Min 220 km/h · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300Max 285 km/h · Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe
Power-to-weight5e / 22
236 hp/t
Min 149 hp/t · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300Max 269 hp/t · Bmw X6 M Competition

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW X5 G05 range

Generation G05 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the G05

Compare

Popular duels involving the X5 M50i

Frequently asked questions

BMW X5 M50i: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 22 E-SUV 2017–2021, the X5 M50i ranks 6th of 22 in 0–100 km/h (4.3 s, behind the Bmw X5 M Competition), 9th of 22 in Top speed (250 km/h, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe), 5th of 22 in Power-to-weight (236 hp/t, behind the Bmw X6 M Competition).

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Bmw X5 M Competition leads in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s vs 4.3 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X5 M50i vs Bmw X5 M Competition duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.