BMW X5 M50i
530 hp, 4,3 s 0-100 : among the 22 E-SUV 2017–2021, the X5 M50i ranks 6th of 22 in 0–100 km/h, 12th of 22 in Top speed, 5th of 22 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 530 hp
- 750 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 4.3 s
- VMax 250 km/h
- Cons.
- 10.7 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 83 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Displacement
- 4,395 cm³
- Power
- 530 hp
- Couple
- 750 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 10.7 L/100 km
- Tank
- 83 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 4,3 s
- VMax
- 250 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,922 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,975 mm
- Width
- 2,004 mm
- Height
- 1,745 mm
- Boot
- 650 L
- Kerb weight
- 2,250 kg
- Cd
- 0.35
- CO₂ WLTP
- 243 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 22 E-SUV, the X5 M50i ranks (top 6 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Demanding drivers: 6th of 22 in 0–100 km/h (4.3 s), 5th of 22 in Power-to-weight (236 hp/t). 6th of 22 in 0–100 km/h (4.3 s), 5th of 22 in Power-to-weight (236 hp/t).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 10,7 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the BMW X5 M Competition (1st with 3.8 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe (1st with 285 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 4.3 s 0-100 (6th of 22 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the X5 M50i ranks 6th of 22 in 0–100 km/h, 0.5 s off the reference BMW X5 M Competition (3.8 s).
Top speed: 250 km/h (12th of 22 in Top speed)
Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 285 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripChronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performanceWhere the X5 M50i stands against E-SUV
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW X5 G05 range
Generation G05 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G05
Popular duels involving the X5 M50i
Continue with the BMW X5 M50i
The same car, from other angles.
BMW X5 M50i: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the X5 M50i rank in its segment?
Among the 22 E-SUV 2017–2021, the X5 M50i ranks 6th of 22 in 0–100 km/h (4.3 s, behind the BMW X5 M Competition), 12th of 22 in Top speed (250 km/h, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe), 5th of 22 in Power-to-weight (236 hp/t, behind the BMW X6 M Competition).
How much does the X5 M50i cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a BMW X5 M Competition instead?
The BMW X5 M Competition leads in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s vs 4.3 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X5 M50i vs BMW X5 M Competition duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.