G05 · GENERATION 2019 · LARGE SUV
BMWICE

X5 M50i

530 hp, 4,3 s 0-100 : among the 22 E-SUV 2017–2021, the X5 M50i ranks 7th of 22 in 0–100 km/h, 13th of 22 in Top speed, 5th of 22 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate2,76115,000 km · UK mix · home UK £/kWhCustomise →

Power

530hp

750 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

4.3s

VMax 250 km/h

Cons.

10.7L

/100 km

Tank

83L

Sur cette page

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW X5 M50i

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureUnknown
Displacement4,395 cm\u00b3
Power530 hp
Couple750 Nm
GearboxTorque Converter 8 rapports Automatic
TransmissionX5 M50i

Consumption

Cons. WLTP10,7 L/100km
Tank83 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h4,3 s
VMax250 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,922 mm
Wheelbase2,975 mm
Width2,004 mm
Height1,745 mm
Boot650 L
Kerb weight2,250 kg
Cd0.35
CO₂ WLTP243 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 22 E-SUV, the X5 M50i ranks (top 7 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle

Caralogy Verdict

Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 7th of 22 in 0–100 km/h (4.3 s), 5th of 22 in Power-to-weight (236 hp/t). 7th of 22 in 0–100 km/h (4.3 s), 5th of 22 in Power-to-weight (236 hp/t).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 10,7 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Bmw X6 M Competition (1st with 3.8 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe (1st with 285 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 4.3 s 0-100 (7th of 22 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the X5 M50i ranks 7th of 22 in 0–100 km/h, 0.5 s off the reference Bmw X6 M Competition (3.8 s).

Top speed: 250 km/h (13th of 22 in Top speed)

Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 285 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the X5 M50i stands against E-SUV

Comparison across 22 E-SUV marketed between 2017–2021.

0–100 km/h

7eout of 22

4,3 s
Min6,8 s · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300
Max3,8 s · Bmw X6 M Competition

Top speed

13eout of 22

250 km/h
Min220 km/h · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300
Max285 km/h · Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe

Power-to-weight

5eout of 22

236 hp/t
Min149 hp/t · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300
Max269 hp/t · Bmw X6 M Competition

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW X5 G05 range

Generation G05 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the G05

Compare

Popular duels involving the X5 M50i

Take the next step

Find a X5 M50i or value yours

Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.

Frequently asked questions

BMW X5 M50i: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the X5 M50i rank in its segment?#

Among the 22 E-SUV 2017–2021, the X5 M50i ranks 7th of 22 in 0–100 km/h (4.3 s, behind the Bmw X6 M Competition), 13th of 22 in Top speed (250 km/h, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe), 5th of 22 in Power-to-weight (236 hp/t, behind the Bmw X6 M Competition).

How much does the X5 M50i cost to run?#

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Bmw X6 M Competition instead?#

The Bmw X6 M Competition leads in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s vs 4.3 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X5 M50i vs Bmw X6 M Competition duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?#

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.