Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /small SUV
APumaPetrolvsBQ2Diesel
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsPuma · Q2

Ford Puma EcoBoost 125 vs Audi Q2

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

small SUV · 2020 vs 2026 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
FordPetrolPlus rapide

Puma EcoBoost 125

125 ch · 2020

VS
AudiDiesel

Q2

116 ch · 2026

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start réservoir plein · mild weather

Result · total trip time

AFord Puma EcoBoost 125

7h01no stop

0 stops · 67.27 €

Gap5 minin favour of Puma EcoBoost 125
BAudi Q2

7h06charging included

1 stop · 111.42 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasurePuma EcoBoost 125Q2Gap
Total time7h017h065 min · Puma EcoBoost 125
Charging stops0 stops1 stop1 stop · Puma EcoBoost 125
Cost of energy used67.27 €111.42 €44.15 € · Puma EcoBoost 125

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

FordPetrolFastest
Puma EcoBoost 125
100%
1050 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h01
0
Stops
7h01
Duration
67.27 €
Cost of energy used
AudiDiesel
Q2
100%
679 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Refuel 1
5 min · +45 L · 97.65 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h06
1
Stops
7h06
Duration
111.42 €
Cost of energy used

The 5-minute lead of the Puma EcoBoost 125 does not come from driving speed, but from one fewer charging stop on this route (0 vs 1).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: no stop for the Puma EcoBoost 125 versus 1 stop of 5 min for the Q2.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (4,3 L/100km for Puma EcoBoost 125 and 5,3 L/100km for Q2) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 4,0 L/100km (Puma EcoBoost 125) and 6,6 L/100km (Q2). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

Ford Puma EcoBoost 125

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L775 km31 L consumed0.087 €/km67.27 €
Trip total67.27 €

Audi Q2

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Manosque, A51fuel · 2.17 €/L679 km45 L consumed0.144 €/km97.65 €
Manosque, A51 → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L96 km6 L consumed0.143 €/km13.77 €
Trip total111.42 €

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
4.3 L/100 km · 5.3 L/100 km
Fuel tank
42 L · 50 L

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

FordPetrol

Puma EcoBoost 125

125 ch · 2020

AudiDiesel

Q2

116 ch · 2026

Other duels you might be interested in

FordVSHonda

Puma EcoBoost 125 vs HR-V

PeugeotVSFord

2008 PureTech 130 EAT8 vs Puma EcoBoost 125

RenaultVSFord

Captur TCe 130 EDC vs Puma EcoBoost 125

FordVSPeugeot

Puma EcoBoost 125 vs 2008 PureTech 110

Frequently asked questions

On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the Puma EcoBoost 125 arrives in 7h01 with 0 fuel stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 67.27 € (Puma EcoBoost 125) and 111.42 € (Q2). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 3008 1.2 PureTech 130 (~7.8 L/100 km) would cost about 112 € in fuel.