GA · GENERATION 2026 · SMALL SUV
AudiICE

Q2

116 hp, 10,5 s 0-100 : among the 11 B-SUV 2024–2028, the Q2 ranks 3rd of 11 in Combined consumption, 2nd of 10 in Tank range, 10th of 11 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,36715,000 km · UK mix · home UK £/kWhCustomise →

Power

116hp

300 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

10.5s

VMax 202 km/h

Cons.

5.3L

/100 km

Tank

50L

Sur cette page

Technical identity card

Full specifications Audi Q2

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureUnknown
Displacement1,968 cm\u00b3
Power116 hp
Couple300 Nm
GearboxManual 6 rapports Manual
TransmissionFWD

Consumption

Cons. WLTP5,3 L/100km
Tank50 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h10,5 s
VMax202 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,208 mm
Wheelbase2,588 mm
Width1,794 mm
Height1,502 mm
Boot405 L
Kerb weight1,365 kg
Cd0.32
CO₂ WLTP139 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 11 B-SUV, the Q2 ranks (top 3 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle

Caralogy Verdict

Suitable for

Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 3rd of 11 in Combined consumption (5.3 L/100), 2nd of 10 in Tank range (943 km).

Less suitable for

Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Dacia Duster Hybrid 140 (1st with 4.6 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Dacia Duster Hybrid 140 (1st with 1087 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 5.3 L/100 L/100 (3rd of 11 in Combined consumption)

The Q2 consumes 5.3 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Dacia Duster Hybrid 140 (4.6 L/100).

Tank range: 943 km (2nd of 10 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the Q2 covers 943 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1087 km.

Segment positioning

Where the Q2 stands against B-SUV

Comparison across 11 B-SUV marketed between 2024–2028.

Combined consumption

3eout of 11

5.3 L/100
Min8.3 L/100 · Audi SQ2
Max4.6 L/100 · Dacia Duster Hybrid 140

Tank range

2eout of 10

943 km
Min663 km · Audi SQ2
Max1 087 km · Dacia Duster Hybrid 140

0–100 km/h

10eout of 11

10,5 s
Min10,5 s · Audi Q2 30 TFSI
Max4,9 s · Audi SQ2

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full Audi Q2 GA range

Generation GA launched in 2016. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the GA

Compare

Popular duels involving the Q2

Take the next step

Find a Q2 or value yours

Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.

Frequently asked questions

Audi Q2: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the Q2 rank in its segment?#

Among the 11 B-SUV 2024–2028, the Q2 ranks 3rd of 11 in Combined consumption (5.3 L/100, behind the Dacia Duster Hybrid 140), 2nd of 10 in Tank range (943 km, behind the Dacia Duster Hybrid 140), 10th of 11 in 0–100 km/h (10.5 s, behind the Audi SQ2).

What is the range of the Q2?#

943 km on a full tank (5.3 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 2nd of 10 in autonomie du segment.

How much does the Q2 cost to run?#

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Dacia Duster Hybrid 140 instead?#

The Dacia Duster Hybrid 140 leads in Combined consumption (4.6 L/100 vs 5.3 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Q2 vs Dacia Duster Hybrid 140 duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?#

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.