Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /compact SUV
AE-PACEvsB520iPetrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsE-PACE · 520i

Jaguar E-PACE P200 vs BMW 520i Touring G30

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

compact SUV · 2018 vs 2018 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
JaguarPetrol

E-PACE P200

200 ch · 2018

VS
BMWPetrolPlus rapide

520i Touring G30

184 ch · 2018

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start réservoir plein · mild weather

Result · total trip time

AJaguar E-PACE P200

7h06charging included

1 stop · 161.87 €

Gap5 minin favour of 520i Touring
BBMW 520i Touring G30

7h01no stop

0 stops · 94.18 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureE-PACE P200520i Touring G30Gap
Total time7h067h015 min · 520i Touring G30
Charging stops1 stop0 stops1 stop · 520i Touring G30
Cost of energy used161.87 €94.18 €67.69 € · 520i Touring G30

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

JaguarPetrol
E-PACE P200
100%
636 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Refuel 1
5 min · +61 L · 132.80 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h06
1
Stops
7h06
Duration
161.87 €
Cost of energy used
BMWPetrolFastest
520i Touring G30
100%
1214 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h01
0
Stops
7h01
Duration
94.18 €
Cost of energy used

The 5-minute lead of the 520i Touring G30 does not come from driving speed, but from one fewer charging stop on this route (0 vs 1).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: no stop for the 520i Touring G30 versus 1 stop of 5 min for the E-PACE P200.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (7,7 L/100km for E-PACE P200 and 6,3 L/100km for 520i Touring G30) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 9,6 L/100km (E-PACE P200) and 5,6 L/100km (520i Touring G30). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

Jaguar E-PACE P200

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Montélimar, A7fuel · 2.17 €/L636 km61 L consumed0.209 €/km132.80 €
Montélimar, A7 → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L139 km13 L consumed0.209 €/km29.06 €
Trip total161.87 €

BMW 520i Touring G30

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L775 km43 L consumed0.122 €/km94.18 €
Trip total94.18 €

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
7.7 L/100 km · 6.3 L/100 km
Fuel tank
68 L · 68 L

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

JaguarPetrol

E-PACE P200

200 ch · 2018

BMWPetrol

520i Touring G30

184 ch · 2018

Other duels you might be interested in

JaguarVSVolvo

E-PACE P200 vs XC40 B4

AudiVSBMW

A6 Avant TFSI S tronic 150 kW vs 520i Touring

AudiVSJaguar

Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro S tronic 150 kW vs E-PACE P200

AudiVSBMW

A6 Sedan vs 520i Touring

Frequently asked questions

On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the 520i Touring G30 arrives in 7h01 with 0 fuel stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 161.87 € (E-PACE P200) and 94.18 € (520i Touring G30). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 3008 1.2 PureTech 130 (~7.8 L/100 km) would cost about 112 € in fuel.