Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /SUV
AE-PACEvsB520iPetrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsE-PACE · 520i

Jaguar E-PACE P200 vs BMW 520i Touring G30: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

compact SUV · 2018 vs 2018 · Methodology
JaguarPetrol

E-PACE P200

200 hp · 320 Nm · 1,748 kg · 2018

VS
BMWPetrolFaster

520i Touring G30

184 hp · 290 Nm · 1,635 kg · 2018

Result · 0–100 km/h

AJaguar E-PACE P200

8.35 s

Gap0.19 sin favour of 520i Touring
BBMW 520i Touring G30

8.16 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureE-PACE P200520i Touring G30Gap
0–100 km/h8.35 s8.16 s0.19 s · 520i Touring G30
400 m standing start16.19 s15.95 s0.24 s · 520i Touring G30
1,000 m standing start29.41 s29.29 s0.12 s · 520i Touring G30
Top speed (electronically limited)215 km/h222 km/h7 km/h · 520i Touring G30
Power-to-weight ratio8.74 kg/hp8.89 kg/hpbetter ratio · E-PACE P200

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

JaguarPetrolE-PACE P200
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
BMWPetrol520i Touring G30
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageE-PACE P200520i Touring G30
0–30 km/h1.98 s1.63 s
0–50 km/h3.33 s2.83 s
0–80 km/h5.88 s5.58 s
0–100 km/h8.35 s8.16 s
0–120 km/h11.44 s · tight gap11.46 s
0–160 km/h21.17 s21.54 s
0–200 km/h45.14 s43.80 s
400 m standing start16.19 s15.95 s
1,000 m standing start29.41 s29.29 s · tight gap
Top speed215 km/h222 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Jaguar

E-PACE P200

8,74kg/hpratio better by 0,15 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power200 hpPending
Torque320 Nm
Weight1 748 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
Drivetrain-
Gearbox9-speed automatic ZF
BMW

520i Touring G30

8,89kg/hpcompensated by −113 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power184 hp4 cyl
Torque290 Nm
Weight1 635 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainPropulsion
Gearbox8-speed Steptronic

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the 520i Touring hits 100 km/h in 8.16 s versus 8.35 s for the E-PACE P200. At this point, the 520i Touring leads by 0.19 s and sits roughly 9 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the 520i Touring is doing 114 km/h against 115 km/h for the E-PACE P200. The gap is 0.30 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.

At 400 metres standing start, the 520i Touring crosses the line in 15.95 s versus 16.19 s. The 0.24 s gap represents roughly 9 m of track - barely a car length.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The E-PACE P200 maxes out at 215 km/h while the 520i Touring keeps accelerating towards 222 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.18 s.

At 1,000 metres, the 520i Touring finishes in 29.29 s versus 29.41 s, with just 0.12 s to spare. The E-PACE P200 fails to fully close the launch gap.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the E-PACE P200 is capped at 215 km/h, the 520i Touring at 225 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.74 kg/hp vs 8.89 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.47 seconds. The 0.19 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Other duels you might be interested in

JaguarVSVolvo

E-PACE P200 vs XC40 B4

AudiVSBMW

A6 Avant TFSI S tronic 150 kW vs 520i Touring

AudiVSJaguar

Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro S tronic 150 kW vs E-PACE P200

AudiVSBMW

A6 Sedan vs 520i Touring

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, 520i Touring G30 wins (8,16 s vs 8,35 s).

E-PACE P200 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,35 seconds (calibrated simulation).

E-PACE P200: 200 hp, ratio 8,74 kg/hp. 520i Touring G30: 184 hp, ratio 8,89 kg/hp.

E-PACE P200: 215 km/h. 520i Touring G30: 222 km/h.