KiaBEV
EV6 GT AWD
585 ch · 74 kWh · 2023
Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.
| Measure | EV6 GT AWD | X4 M40i G02 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total time | 8h05 | 7h01 | 64 min · X4 M40i G02 |
| Charging stops | 4 stops | 0 stops | 4 stops · X4 M40i G02 |
| Cost of energy used | 76.83 € | 117.72 € | 40.89 € · EV6 GT AWD |
Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The X4 M40i G02 (combustion) makes no stop, the EV6 GT AWD (electric) 4 stops totalling 64 min. Road safety reminder: on a trip of this duration, it is recommended to stop for at least 68 min total (17 min every 2h). The energy cost is 76,83 € for EV6 GT AWD versus 117,72 € for X4 M40i G02.
The official WLTP figures (17,8 kWh/100km for EV6 GT AWD and 8,1 L/100km for X4 M40i G02) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 22,3 kWh/100km (EV6 GT AWD) and 7,0 L/100km (X4 M40i G02). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.
On a 200 km round trip (e.g. a weekend getaway), the electric or plug-in hybrid vehicle completes the entire journey on home energy at 0.20 €/kWh - with no charging stop. The time advantage of the combustion car on long-distance motorways disappears entirely, and the economic advantage of electric strengthens considerably.
| Segment | Energy used | Distance | Consumption | €/km | Cost (€) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paris → Tournus, A6 | initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh | 299 km | 67 kWh consumed | 0.045 €/km | 13.33 € |
| Tournus, A6 → Limonest, A6 | energy charged at Ionity 104 kW · 0.60 €/kWh | 133 km | 30 kWh consumed | 0.134 €/km | 17.76 € |
| Limonest, A6 → Montélimar, A7 | energy charged at Ionity 104 kW · 0.60 €/kWh | 133 km | 30 kWh consumed | 0.134 €/km | 17.76 € |
| Montélimar, A7 → Manosque, A51 | energy charged at Ionity 104 kW · 0.60 €/kWh | 133 km | 30 kWh consumed | 0.134 €/km | 17.76 € |
| Manosque, A51 → Marseille | energy charged at Ionity 109 kW · 0.60 €/kWh | 77 km | 17 kWh consumed | 0.133 €/km | 10.22 € |
| Trip total | 76.83 € |
| Segment | Energy used | Distance | Consumption | €/km | Cost (€) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paris → Marseille | fuel · 2.17 €/L | 775 km | 54 L consumed | 0.152 €/km | 117.72 € |
| Trip total | 117.72 € |
| Charging stop duration | Kia EV6 GT AWD | BMW X4 M40i G02 |
|---|---|---|
| 5 minutes | - | - |
| 10 minutes | - | - |
| 20 minutes | - | - |
| Full session 10 → 80 % | - | - |
Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment
585 ch · 74 kWh · 2023
360 ch · 2020
The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the X4 M40i G02 arrives in 7h01 with 0 fuel stops.
WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.
Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.
No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.
On this trip, the energy used costs 76.83 € (EV6 GT AWD) and 117.72 € (X4 M40i G02). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 3008 1.2 PureTech 130 (~7.8 L/100 km) would cost about 112 € in fuel.