Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /limousine
AEQSvsBi5BEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsEQS · i5

Mercedes EQS 450 V297 vs BMW i5 eDrive40 G60

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

limousine · 2023 vs 2025 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
MercedesBEV

EQS 450 V297

333 ch · 107.8 kWh · 2023

VS
BMWBEVPlus rapide

i5 eDrive40 G60

313 ch · 74.8 kWh · 2025

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start 100 % · mild weather

Result · total trip time

AMercedes EQS 450 V297

7h24charging included

2 stops · 58.85 €

Gap2 minin favour of i5 eDrive40
BBMW i5 eDrive40 G60

7h22charging included

2 stops · 49.80 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureEQS 450 V297i5 eDrive40 G60Gap
Total time7h247h222 min · i5 eDrive40 G60
Charging stops2 stops2 stopsSame
Cost of energy used58.85 €49.80 €9.05 € · i5 eDrive40 G60

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

MercedesBEV
EQS 450 V297
100%
513 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
14 min · +43 kWh · 25.87 €
Charge 2
9 min · +29 kWh · 17.35 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h24
2
Stops
7h24
Duration
58.85 €
Cost of energy used
BMWBEVFastest
i5 eDrive40 G60
100%
453 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
9 min · +30 kWh · 17.95 €
Charge 2
12 min · +36 kWh · 21.35 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h22
2
Stops
7h22
Duration
49.80 €
Cost of energy used

The 2-minute lead of the i5 eDrive40 G60 does not come from driving speed, but from shorter stops on this route (21 min vs 23 min).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: 2 stops totalling 21 min for the i5 eDrive40 G60 versus 2 stops totalling 23 min for the EQS 450 V297.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (18,3 kWh/100km for EQS 450 V297 and 18,0 kWh/100km for i5 eDrive40 G60) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 21,0 kWh/100km (EQS 450 V297) and 16,5 kWh/100km (i5 eDrive40 G60). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Recovery speed: 18,9 km/min versus 14,9 km/min

During the 21 minutes of charging for the i5 eDrive40 G60, range recovers by 397 km. During the 23 cumulative minutes for the EQS 450 V297, range recovers by 343 km. Per minute: the i5 eDrive40 G60 recovers 1,3× faster. The gap is less pronounced but accumulates over long distances.

For reference: how much would an equivalent petrol car cost?

A Mercedes S 450 (equivalent segment) consumes about 9,0 L/100km on the motorway at 130 km/h. At 1,9 €/L, this Paris → Marseille trip would cost ~129 €. That is 2,2× the electric cost of the EQS 450 V297 and 2,6× that of the i5 eDrive40 G60. The gap narrows in winter but never reverses.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

Mercedes EQS 450 V297

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Limonest, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh462 km97 kWh consumed0.042 €/km19.41 €
Limonest, A6 → Manosque, A51energy charged at Ionity 185 kW · 0.60 €/kWh205 km43 kWh consumed0.126 €/km25.87 €
Manosque, A51 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 193 kW · 0.60 €/kWh108 km23 kWh consumed0.126 €/km13.57 €
Trip total58.85 €

BMW i5 eDrive40 G60

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Limonest, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh408 km67 kWh consumed0.033 €/km13.47 €
Limonest, A6 → Montélimar, A7energy charged at Ionity 199 kW · 0.60 €/kWh181 km30 kWh consumed0.099 €/km17.95 €
Montélimar, A7 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 178 kW · 0.60 €/kWh186 km31 kWh consumed0.099 €/km18.38 €
Trip total49.80 €

Range recovered by stop duration

How many kilometres do you recover depending on the time spent at the charger? Comparison at nominal peak power.
Charging stop durationMercedes EQS 450 V297BMW i5 eDrive40 G60
5 minutes~56 km~72 km
10 minutes~111 km~145 km
20 minutes~222 km~290 km
Full session 10 → 80 %~359 km · 31 min~317 km · 24 min

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
18.3 kWh/100 km · 18.0 kWh/100 km
Net battery
107.8 kWh · 74.8 kWh
Max DC charging
200 kW · 205 kW

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

MercedesBEV

EQS 450 V297

333 ch · 107.8 kWh · 2023

BMWBEV

i5 eDrive40 G60

313 ch · 74.8 kWh · 2025

Other duels you might be interested in

BMWVSMercedes

i7 xDrive60 vs EQS 450

BMWVSAudi

i5 eDrive40 vs A6 Avant e-tron

BMWVSMercedes

i7 M70 xDrive vs EQS 450

TeslaVSBMW

Model S 85 vs i5 eDrive40

Frequently asked questions

The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the i5 eDrive40 G60 arrives in 7h22 with 2 charging stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 58.85 € (EQS 450 V297) and 49.80 € (i5 eDrive40 G60). For reference, an equivalent Mercedes S 450 (~9.0 L/100 km) would cost about 129 € in fuel.