Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /limousine
AEQSBEVvsBPanamera 4Petrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsEQS · Panamera 4

Mercedes EQS 450 V297 vs Porsche Panamera 4

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

limousine · 2023 vs 2018 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
MercedesBEV

EQS 450 V297

333 ch · 107.8 kWh · 2023

VS
PorschePetrolPlus rapide

Panamera 4

330 ch · 2018

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start 100 % · mild weather

Result · total trip time

AMercedes EQS 450 V297

7h24charging included

2 stops · 58.85 €

Gap23 minin favour of Panamera 4
BPorsche Panamera 4

7h01no stop

0 stops · 141.27 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureEQS 450 V297Panamera 4Gap
Total time7h247h0123 min · Panamera 4
Charging stops2 stops0 stops2 stops · Panamera 4
Cost of energy used58.85 €141.27 €82.42 € · EQS 450 V297

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

MercedesBEV
EQS 450 V297
100%
513 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
14 min · +43 kWh · 25.87 €
Charge 2
9 min · +29 kWh · 17.35 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h24
2
Stops
7h24
Duration
58.85 €
Cost of energy used
PorschePetrolFastest
Panamera 4
100%
893 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h01
0
Stops
7h01
Duration
141.27 €
Cost of energy used

The 23-minute lead of the Panamera 4 (combustion) comes from not needing a charging stop: no stop versus 2 stops totalling 23 min for the EQS 450 V297 (electric).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The Panamera 4 (combustion) makes no stop, the EQS 450 V297 (electric) 2 stops totalling 23 min. Road safety reminder: on a trip of this duration, it is recommended to stop for at least 51 min total (17 min every 2h). The energy cost is 58,85 € for EQS 450 V297 versus 141,27 € for Panamera 4.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (18,3 kWh/100km for EQS 450 V297 and 9,8 L/100km for Panamera 4) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 21,0 kWh/100km (EQS 450 V297) and 8,4 L/100km (Panamera 4). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

What about a 200 km round trip?

On a 200 km round trip (e.g. a weekend getaway), the electric or plug-in hybrid vehicle completes the entire journey on home energy at 0.20 €/kWh - with no charging stop. The time advantage of the combustion car on long-distance motorways disappears entirely, and the economic advantage of electric strengthens considerably.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

Mercedes EQS 450 V297

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Limonest, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh462 km97 kWh consumed0.042 €/km19.41 €
Limonest, A6 → Manosque, A51energy charged at Ionity 185 kW · 0.60 €/kWh205 km43 kWh consumed0.126 €/km25.87 €
Manosque, A51 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 193 kW · 0.60 €/kWh108 km23 kWh consumed0.126 €/km13.57 €
Trip total58.85 €

Porsche Panamera 4

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L775 km65 L consumed0.182 €/km141.27 €
Trip total141.27 €

Range recovered by stop duration

How many kilometres do you recover depending on the time spent at the charger? Comparison at nominal peak power.
Charging stop durationMercedes EQS 450 V297Porsche Panamera 4
5 minutes~56 km-
10 minutes~111 km-
20 minutes~222 km-
Full session 10 → 80 %~359 km · 31 min-

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
18.3 kWh/100 km · 9.8 L/100 km

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

MercedesBEV

EQS 450 V297

333 ch · 107.8 kWh · 2023

PorschePetrol

Panamera 4

330 ch · 2018

Other duels you might be interested in

BMWVSMercedes

i7 xDrive60 vs EQS 450

BMWVSPorsche

840i vs Panamera 4

BMWVSMercedes

i7 M70 xDrive vs EQS 450

BMWVSPorsche

840i vs Panamera 4

Frequently asked questions

The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the Panamera 4 arrives in 7h01 with 0 fuel stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 58.85 € (EQS 450 V297) and 141.27 € (Panamera 4). For reference, an equivalent Mercedes S 450 (~9.0 L/100 km) would cost about 129 € in fuel.