971 · GENERATION 2018 · LIMOUSINE
PorscheICE

Panamera 4

330 hp, 5,4 s 0-100 : among the 30 limousines 2016–2020, the Panamera 4 ranks 29th of 30 in 0–100 km/h, 9th of 30 in Top speed, 30th of 30 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate2,96915,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

330hp

449 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

5.4s

VMax 257 km/h

Cons.

9.8L

/100 km

Tank

75L

Technical identity card

Full specifications Porsche Panamera 4

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureV · 6 cyl. · Turbo
Displacement2,995 cm³
Puissance thermique335 hp
Combined power330 hp
Combined torque449 Nm
GearboxDouble embrayage 8 rapports Automatique
TransmissionIntegrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP9.8 L/100km
Tank75 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h5,4 s
VMax257 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length5,050 mm
Wheelbase2,949 mm
Width1,938 mm
Height1,427 mm
Boot18 L
Kerb weight2,008 kg
Cd0.28
CO₂ WLTP225 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 30 limousines, the Panamera 4 ranks (in the bottom third) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 9th of 30 in Top speed (257 km/h). 9th of 30 in Top speed (257 km/h).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 9,8 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Porsche Panamera Turbo (1st with 3.6 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Porsche Panamera Turbo (1st with 308 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 5.4 s 0-100 (29th of 30 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the Panamera 4 ranks 29th of 30 in 0–100 km/h, 1.8 s off the reference Porsche Panamera Turbo (3.6 s).

Top speed: 257 km/h (9th of 30 in Top speed)

Top speed of 257 km/h. The segment reference reaches 308 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the Panamera 4 stands against limousines

Comparison across 30 limousines marketed between 2016–2020.

0–100 km/h29e / 30
5,4 s
Min 5,5 s · Bmw 840i ConvertibleMax 3,6 s · Porsche Panamera Turbo
Top speed9e / 30
257 km/h
Min 250 km/h · Bmw 840d xDriveMax 308 km/h · Porsche Panamera Turbo
Power-to-weight30e / 30
164 hp/t
Min 164 hp/t · Porsche Panamera 4Max 280 hp/t · Bmw M850i xDrive

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full Porsche Panamera 971 range

Generation 971 launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the 971

Compare

Popular duels involving the Panamera 4

Frequently asked questions

Porsche Panamera 4: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 30 limousines 2016–2020, the Panamera 4 ranks 29th of 30 in 0–100 km/h (5.4 s, behind the Porsche Panamera Turbo), 9th of 30 in Top speed (257 km/h, behind the Porsche Panamera Turbo), 30th of 30 in Power-to-weight (164 hp/t, behind the Bmw M850i xDrive).

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Porsche Panamera Turbo leads in 0–100 km/h (3.6 s vs 5.4 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Panamera 4 vs Porsche Panamera Turbo duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.