Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /limousine
AEQSvsBMONABEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsEQS · MONA

Mercedes EQS 450 V297 vs Xpeng MONA M03

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

limousine · 2023 vs 2024 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
MercedesBEVPlus rapide

EQS 450 V297

333 ch · 107.8 kWh · 2023

VS
XpengBEV

MONA M03

208 ch · 58 kWh · 2024

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start 100 % · mild weather

Result · total trip time

AMercedes EQS 450 V297

7h24charging included

2 stops · 58.85 €

Gap12 minin favour of EQS 450
BXpeng MONA M03

7h36charging included

2 stops · 34.93 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureEQS 450 V297MONA M03Gap
Total time7h247h3612 min · EQS 450 V297
Charging stops2 stops2 stopsSame
Cost of energy used58.85 €34.93 €23.92 € · MONA M03

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

MercedesBEVFastest
EQS 450 V297
100%
513 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
14 min · +43 kWh · 25.87 €
Charge 2
9 min · +29 kWh · 17.35 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h24
2
Stops
7h24
Duration
58.85 €
Cost of energy used
XpengBEV
MONA M03
100%
483 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
18 min · +23 kWh · 13.92 €
Charge 2
17 min · +21 kWh · 12.72 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h36
2
Stops
7h36
Duration
34.93 €
Cost of energy used

The 12-minute lead of the EQS 450 V297 does not come from driving speed, but from shorter stops on this route (23 min vs 35 min).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: 2 stops totalling 23 min for the EQS 450 V297 versus 2 stops totalling 35 min for the MONA M03.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (18,3 kWh/100km for EQS 450 V297 and 10,0 kWh/100km for MONA M03) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 21,0 kWh/100km (EQS 450 V297) and 12,0 kWh/100km (MONA M03). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Recovery speed: 14,9 km/min versus 10,6 km/min

During the 23 minutes of charging for the EQS 450 V297, range recovers by 343 km. During the 35 cumulative minutes for the MONA M03, range recovers by 370 km. Per minute: the EQS 450 V297 recovers 1,4× faster. The gap is less pronounced but accumulates over long distances.

For reference: how much would an equivalent petrol car cost?

A Mercedes S 450 (equivalent segment) consumes about 9,0 L/100km on the motorway at 130 km/h. At 1,9 €/L, this Paris → Marseille trip would cost ~129 €. That is 2,2× the electric cost of the EQS 450 V297 and 3,7× that of the MONA M03. The gap narrows in winter but never reverses.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

Mercedes EQS 450 V297

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Limonest, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh462 km97 kWh consumed0.042 €/km19.41 €
Limonest, A6 → Manosque, A51energy charged at Ionity 185 kW · 0.60 €/kWh205 km43 kWh consumed0.126 €/km25.87 €
Manosque, A51 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 193 kW · 0.60 €/kWh108 km23 kWh consumed0.126 €/km13.57 €
Trip total58.85 €

Xpeng MONA M03

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Limonest, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh435 km52 kWh consumed0.024 €/km10.45 €
Limonest, A6 → Montélimar, A7energy charged at Ionity 77 kW · 0.60 €/kWh193 km23 kWh consumed0.072 €/km13.92 €
Montélimar, A7 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 75 kW · 0.60 €/kWh147 km18 kWh consumed0.072 €/km10.56 €
Trip total34.93 €

Range recovered by stop duration

How many kilometres do you recover depending on the time spent at the charger? Comparison at nominal peak power.
Charging stop durationMercedes EQS 450 V297Xpeng MONA M03
5 minutes~56 km~39 km
10 minutes~111 km~78 km
20 minutes~222 km~156 km
Full session 10 → 80 %~359 km · 31 min~338 km · 47 min

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
18.3 kWh/100 km · 10.0 kWh/100 km
Net battery
107.8 kWh · 58 kWh
Max DC charging
200 kW · 80 kW

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

MercedesBEV

EQS 450 V297

333 ch · 107.8 kWh · 2023

XpengBEV

MONA M03

208 ch · 58 kWh · 2024

Other duels you might be interested in

BMWVSMercedes

i7 xDrive60 vs EQS 450

XpengVSVolkswagen

MONA M03 vs ID.3 Pro

BMWVSMercedes

i7 M70 xDrive vs EQS 450

XpengVSVolkswagen

MONA M03 vs ID.3 Pro S

Frequently asked questions

The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the EQS 450 V297 arrives in 7h24 with 2 charging stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 58.85 € (EQS 450 V297) and 34.93 € (MONA M03). For reference, an equivalent Mercedes S 450 (~9.0 L/100 km) would cost about 129 € in fuel.