Scenic E-Tech Electric 220
218 ch · 87 kWh · 2024
Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.
| Measure | Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 | Atto 3 Extended Range | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total time | 7h44 | 8h03 | 19 min · Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 |
| Charging stops | 3 stops | 3 stops | Same |
| Cost of energy used | 65.18 € | 56.60 € | 8.58 € · Atto 3 Extended Range |
Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: 3 stops totalling 43 min for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 versus 3 stops totalling 62 min for the Atto 3 Extended Range.
The official WLTP figures (16,6 kWh/100km for Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 and 15,5 kWh/100km for Atto 3 Extended Range) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 20,8 kWh/100km (Scenic E-Tech Electric 220) and 16,7 kWh/100km (Atto 3 Extended Range). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.
During the 43 minutes of charging for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220, range recovers by 427 km. During the 62 cumulative minutes for the Atto 3 Extended Range, range recovers by 490 km. Per minute: the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 recovers 1,3× faster. The gap is less pronounced but accumulates over long distances.
A Peugeot 3008 1.2 PureTech 130 (equivalent segment) consumes about 7,8 L/100km on the motorway at 130 km/h. At 1,9 €/L, this Paris → Marseille trip would cost ~112 €. That is 1,7× the electric cost of the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 and 2,0× that of the Atto 3 Extended Range. The gap narrows in winter but never reverses.
| Segment | Energy used | Distance | Consumption | €/km | Cost (€) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paris → Tournus, A6 | initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh | 377 km | 78 kWh consumed | 0.042 €/km | 15.67 € |
| Tournus, A6 → Valence, A7 | energy charged at Ionity 123 kW · 0.60 €/kWh | 168 km | 35 kWh consumed | 0.124 €/km | 20.88 € |
| Valence, A7 → Manosque, A51 | energy charged at Ionity 123 kW · 0.60 €/kWh | 168 km | 35 kWh consumed | 0.124 €/km | 20.88 € |
| Manosque, A51 → Marseille | energy charged at Ionity 128 kW · 0.60 €/kWh | 62 km | 13 kWh consumed | 0.125 €/km | 7.75 € |
| Trip total | 65.18 € |
| Segment | Energy used | Distance | Consumption | €/km | Cost (€) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paris → Tournus, A6 | initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh | 315 km | 53 kWh consumed | 0.033 €/km | 10.54 € |
| Tournus, A6 → Limonest, A6 | energy charged at Ionity 83 kW · 0.60 €/kWh | 140 km | 23 kWh consumed | 0.100 €/km | 14.04 € |
| Limonest, A6 → Montélimar, A7 | energy charged at Ionity 83 kW · 0.60 €/kWh | 140 km | 23 kWh consumed | 0.100 €/km | 14.04 € |
| Montélimar, A7 → Marseille | energy charged at Ionity 75 kW · 0.60 €/kWh | 179 km | 30 kWh consumed | 0.100 €/km | 17.98 € |
| Trip total | 56.60 € |
| Charging stop duration | Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 | BYD Atto 3 Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| 5 minutes | - | - |
| 10 minutes | - | - |
| 20 minutes | - | - |
| Full session 10 → 80 % | - | - |
Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment
218 ch · 87 kWh · 2024
204 ch · 58.5 kWh · 2022
The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 arrives in 7h44 with 3 charging stops.
WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.
Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.
No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.
On this trip, the energy used costs 65.18 € (Scenic E-Tech Electric 220) and 56.60 € (Atto 3 Extended Range). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 3008 1.2 PureTech 130 (~7.8 L/100 km) would cost about 112 € in fuel.