Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /saloon
AModel 3vsBP7BEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsModel 3 · P7

Tesla Model 3 Performance vs Xpeng P7

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

saloon · 2024 vs 2020 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
TeslaBEVPlus rapide

Model 3 Performance

510 ch · 78 kWh · 2024

VS
XpengBEV

P7

424 ch · 75 kWh · 2020

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start 100 % · mild weather

Result · total trip time

ATesla Model 3 Performance

7h23charging included

3 stops · 62.09 €

Gap58 minin favour of Model 3 Performance
BXpeng P7

8h21charging included

3 stops · 68.98 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureModel 3 PerformanceP7Gap
Total time7h238h2158 min · Model 3 Performance
Charging stops3 stops3 stopsSame
Cost of energy used62.09 €68.98 €6.89 € · Model 3 Performance

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

TeslaBEVFastest
Model 3 Performance
100%
402 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
8 min · +31 kWh · 18.72 €
Charge 2
8 min · +31 kWh · 18.72 €
Charge 3
6 min · +23 kWh · 14.09 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h23
3
Stops
7h23
Duration
62.09 €
Cost of energy used
XpengBEV
P7
100%
363 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
24 min · +30 kWh · 18.00 €
Charge 2
24 min · +30 kWh · 18.00 €
Charge 3
33 min · +39 kWh · 23.19 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 8h21
3
Stops
8h21
Duration
68.98 €
Cost of energy used

The 58-minute lead of the Model 3 Performance does not come from driving speed, but from shorter stops on this route (22 min vs 80 min).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: 3 stops totalling 22 min for the Model 3 Performance versus 3 stops totalling 80 min for the P7.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (16,7 kWh/100km for Model 3 Performance and 17,2 kWh/100km for P7) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 19,4 kWh/100km (Model 3 Performance) and 20,6 kWh/100km (P7). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Recovery speed: 20,1 km/min versus 6,0 km/min

During the 22 minutes of charging for the Model 3 Performance, range recovers by 443 km. During the 80 cumulative minutes for the P7, range recovers by 479 km. Per minute: the Model 3 Performance recovers 3,4× faster. At this rate, the charging stop blends into the trip rhythm - just enough time for a coffee. At a lower rate, it dictates the pace.

For reference: how much would an equivalent petrol car cost?

A Peugeot 508 1.6 PureTech 180 (equivalent segment) consumes about 7,2 L/100km on the motorway at 130 km/h. At 1,9 €/L, this Paris → Marseille trip would cost ~103 €. That is 1,7× the electric cost of the Model 3 Performance and 1,5× that of the P7. The gap narrows in winter but never reverses.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

Tesla Model 3 Performance

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Tournus, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh362 km70 kWh consumed0.039 €/km14.05 €
Tournus, A6 → Valence, A7energy charged at Supercharger 234 kW · 0.60 €/kWh161 km31 kWh consumed0.116 €/km18.72 €
Valence, A7 → Manosque, A51energy charged at Supercharger 234 kW · 0.60 €/kWh161 km31 kWh consumed0.116 €/km18.72 €
Manosque, A51 → Marseilleenergy charged at Supercharger 235 kW · 0.60 €/kWh91 km18 kWh consumed0.117 €/km10.60 €
Trip total62.09 €

Xpeng P7

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Tournus, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh327 km68 kWh consumed0.041 €/km13.51 €
Tournus, A6 → Valence, A7energy charged at Ionity 75 kW · 0.60 €/kWh145 km30 kWh consumed0.124 €/km18.00 €
Valence, A7 → Montélimar, A7energy charged at Ionity 75 kW · 0.60 €/kWh145 km30 kWh consumed0.124 €/km18.00 €
Montélimar, A7 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 70 kW · 0.60 €/kWh157 km32 kWh consumed0.124 €/km19.48 €
Trip total68.98 €

Range recovered by stop duration

How many kilometres do you recover depending on the time spent at the charger? Comparison at nominal peak power.
Charging stop durationTesla Model 3 PerformanceXpeng P7
5 minutes~75 km~23 km
10 minutes~150 km~45 km
20 minutes~301 km~90 km
Full session 10 → 80 %~282 km · 20 min~254 km · 61 min

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
16.7 kWh/100 km · 17.2 kWh/100 km
Net battery
78 kWh · 75 kWh
Max DC charging
250 kW · 80 kW

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

TeslaBEV

Model 3 Performance

510 ch · 78 kWh · 2024

XpengBEV

P7

424 ch · 75 kWh · 2020

Other duels you might be interested in

BMWVSTesla

i4 M50 xDrive vs Model 3 Performance

TeslaVSXpeng

Model 3 Performance vs P7

TeslaVSVolvo

Model 3 Performance vs V60 T8 AWD Recharge

TeslaVSXpeng

Model 3 Performance vs P7

Frequently asked questions

The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the Model 3 Performance arrives in 7h23 with 3 charging stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 62.09 € (Model 3 Performance) and 68.98 € (P7). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 508 1.6 PureTech 180 (~7.2 L/100 km) would cost about 103 € in fuel.