TeslaBEV
Model S 85
362 ch · 77.5 kWh · 2012
Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.
| Measure | Model S 85 | CLA 250+ mit EQ Technologie | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total time | 8h09 | 7h06 | 63 min · CLA 250+ mit EQ Technologie |
| Charging stops | 4 stops | 1 stop | 3 stops · CLA 250+ mit EQ Technologie |
| Cost of energy used | 86.68 € | 29.11 € | 57.57 € · CLA 250+ mit EQ Technologie |
Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: 1 stop of 5 min for the CLA 250+ mit EQ Technologie versus 4 stops totalling 69 min for the Model S 85.
The official WLTP figures (23,5 kWh/100km for Model S 85 and 10,7 kWh/100km for CLA 250+ mit EQ Technologie) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 24,6 kWh/100km (Model S 85) and 12,8 kWh/100km (CLA 250+ mit EQ Technologie). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.
During the 5 minutes of charging for the CLA 250+ mit EQ Technologie, range recovers by 210 km. During the 69 cumulative minutes for the Model S 85, range recovers by 523 km. Per minute: the CLA 250+ mit EQ Technologie recovers 5,5× faster. At this rate, the charging stop blends into the trip rhythm - just enough time for a coffee. At a lower rate, it dictates the pace.
A BMW 530i (equivalent segment) consumes about 8,0 L/100km on the motorway at 130 km/h. At 1,9 €/L, this Paris → Marseille trip would cost ~115 €. That is 1,3× the electric cost of the Model S 85 and 4,0× that of the CLA 250+ mit EQ Technologie. The gap narrows in winter but never reverses.
| Segment | Energy used | Distance | Consumption | €/km | Cost (€) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paris → Beaune, A6 | initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh | 283 km | 70 kWh consumed | 0.049 €/km | 13.96 € |
| Beaune, A6 → Limonest, A6 | energy charged at Supercharger 116 kW · 0.60 €/kWh | 126 km | 31 kWh consumed | 0.148 €/km | 18.60 € |
| Limonest, A6 → Valence, A7 | energy charged at Supercharger 116 kW · 0.60 €/kWh | 126 km | 31 kWh consumed | 0.148 €/km | 18.60 € |
| Valence, A7 → Manosque, A51 | energy charged at Supercharger 116 kW · 0.60 €/kWh | 126 km | 31 kWh consumed | 0.148 €/km | 18.60 € |
| Manosque, A51 → Marseille | energy charged at Supercharger 107 kW · 0.60 €/kWh | 114 km | 28 kWh consumed | 0.148 €/km | 16.93 € |
| Trip total | 86.68 € |
| Segment | Energy used | Distance | Consumption | €/km | Cost (€) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paris → Montélimar, A7 | initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh | 596 km | 77 kWh consumed | 0.026 €/km | 15.31 € |
| Montélimar, A7 → Marseille | energy charged at Ionity 322 kW · 0.60 €/kWh | 179 km | 23 kWh consumed | 0.077 €/km | 13.81 € |
| Trip total | 29.11 € |
| Charging stop duration | Tesla Model S 85 | Mercedes CLA 250+ mit EQ Technologie |
|---|---|---|
| 5 minutes | ~28 km | ~145 km |
| 10 minutes | ~57 km | ~291 km |
| 20 minutes | ~114 km | ~582 km |
| Full session 10 → 80 % | ~220 km · 42 min | ~463 km · 17 min |
Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment
362 ch · 77.5 kWh · 2012
272 ch · 85 kWh · 2025
The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the CLA 250+ mit EQ Technologie arrives in 7h06 with 1 charging stop.
WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.
Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.
No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.
On this trip, the energy used costs 86.68 € (Model S 85) and 29.11 € (CLA 250+ mit EQ Technologie). For reference, an equivalent BMW 530i (~8.0 L/100 km) would cost about 115 € in fuel.