Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /grand tourer
AModelvsBEQSBEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsModel · EQS

Tesla Model S 85 vs Mercedes EQS 450 V297

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

grand tourer · 2012 vs 2023 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
TeslaBEV

Model S 85

362 ch · 77.5 kWh · 2012

VS
MercedesBEVPlus rapide

EQS 450 V297

333 ch · 107.8 kWh · 2023

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start 100 % · mild weather

Result · total trip time

ATesla Model S 85

8h09charging included

4 stops · 86.68 €

Gap45 minin favour of EQS 450
BMercedes EQS 450 V297

7h24charging included

2 stops · 58.85 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureModel S 85EQS 450 V297Gap
Total time8h097h2445 min · EQS 450 V297
Charging stops4 stops2 stops2 stops · EQS 450 V297
Cost of energy used86.68 €58.85 €27.83 € · EQS 450 V297

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

TeslaBEV
Model S 85
100%
315 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
16 min · +31 kWh · 18.60 €
Charge 2
16 min · +31 kWh · 18.60 €
Charge 3
16 min · +31 kWh · 18.60 €
Charge 4
20 min · +36 kWh · 21.36 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 8h09
4
Stops
8h09
Duration
86.68 €
Cost of energy used
MercedesBEVFastest
EQS 450 V297
100%
513 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
14 min · +43 kWh · 25.87 €
Charge 2
9 min · +29 kWh · 17.35 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h24
2
Stops
7h24
Duration
58.85 €
Cost of energy used

The 45-minute lead of the EQS 450 V297 does not come from driving speed, but from 2 fewer charging stops on this route (2 vs 4).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: 2 stops totalling 23 min for the EQS 450 V297 versus 4 stops totalling 69 min for the Model S 85.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (23,5 kWh/100km for Model S 85 and 18,3 kWh/100km for EQS 450 V297) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 24,6 kWh/100km (Model S 85) and 21,0 kWh/100km (EQS 450 V297). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Recovery speed: 14,9 km/min versus 7,6 km/min

During the 23 minutes of charging for the EQS 450 V297, range recovers by 343 km. During the 69 cumulative minutes for the Model S 85, range recovers by 523 km. Per minute: the EQS 450 V297 recovers 2,0× faster. At this rate, the charging stop blends into the trip rhythm - just enough time for a coffee. At a lower rate, it dictates the pace.

For reference: how much would an equivalent petrol car cost?

A BMW 530i (equivalent segment) consumes about 8,0 L/100km on the motorway at 130 km/h. At 1,9 €/L, this Paris → Marseille trip would cost ~115 €. That is 1,3× the electric cost of the Model S 85 and 2,0× that of the EQS 450 V297. The gap narrows in winter but never reverses.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

Tesla Model S 85

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Beaune, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh283 km70 kWh consumed0.049 €/km13.96 €
Beaune, A6 → Limonest, A6energy charged at Supercharger 116 kW · 0.60 €/kWh126 km31 kWh consumed0.148 €/km18.60 €
Limonest, A6 → Valence, A7energy charged at Supercharger 116 kW · 0.60 €/kWh126 km31 kWh consumed0.148 €/km18.60 €
Valence, A7 → Manosque, A51energy charged at Supercharger 116 kW · 0.60 €/kWh126 km31 kWh consumed0.148 €/km18.60 €
Manosque, A51 → Marseilleenergy charged at Supercharger 107 kW · 0.60 €/kWh114 km28 kWh consumed0.148 €/km16.93 €
Trip total86.68 €

Mercedes EQS 450 V297

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Limonest, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh462 km97 kWh consumed0.042 €/km19.41 €
Limonest, A6 → Manosque, A51energy charged at Ionity 185 kW · 0.60 €/kWh205 km43 kWh consumed0.126 €/km25.87 €
Manosque, A51 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 193 kW · 0.60 €/kWh108 km23 kWh consumed0.126 €/km13.57 €
Trip total58.85 €

Range recovered by stop duration

How many kilometres do you recover depending on the time spent at the charger? Comparison at nominal peak power.
Charging stop durationTesla Model S 85Mercedes EQS 450 V297
5 minutes~28 km~56 km
10 minutes~57 km~111 km
20 minutes~114 km~222 km
Full session 10 → 80 %~220 km · 42 min~359 km · 31 min

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
23.5 kWh/100 km · 18.3 kWh/100 km
Net battery
77.5 kWh · 107.8 kWh
Max DC charging
120 kW · 200 kW

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

TeslaBEV

Model S 85

362 ch · 77.5 kWh · 2012

MercedesBEV

EQS 450 V297

333 ch · 107.8 kWh · 2023

Other duels you might be interested in

AudiVSTesla

A6 Avant e-tron vs Model S 85

BMWVSMercedes

i7 xDrive60 vs EQS 450

BMWVSTesla

i5 xDrive40 vs Model S 85

BMWVSMercedes

i7 M70 xDrive vs EQS 450

Frequently asked questions

The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the EQS 450 V297 arrives in 7h24 with 2 charging stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 86.68 € (Model S 85) and 58.85 € (EQS 450 V297). For reference, an equivalent BMW 530i (~8.0 L/100 km) would cost about 115 € in fuel.