Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /grand tourer
AModelBEVvsBVDiesel
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsModel · V

Tesla Model S 85 vs Mercedes V 300 d 4MATIC (long)

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

grand tourer · 2012 vs 2024 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
TeslaBEV

Model S 85

362 ch · 77.5 kWh · 2012

VS
MercedesDieselPlus rapide

V 300 d 4MATIC (long)

245 ch · 2024

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start 100 % · mild weather

Result · total trip time

ATesla Model S 85

8h09charging included

4 stops · 86.68 €

Gap63 minin favour of V 300 d 4MATIC (long)
BMercedes V 300 d 4MATIC (long)

7h06charging included

1 stop · 175.57 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureModel S 85V 300 d 4MATIC (long)Gap
Total time8h097h0663 min · V 300 d 4MATIC (long)
Charging stops4 stops1 stop3 stops · V 300 d 4MATIC (long)
Cost of energy used86.68 €175.57 €88.89 € · Model S 85

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

TeslaBEV
Model S 85
100%
315 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
16 min · +31 kWh · 18.60 €
Charge 2
16 min · +31 kWh · 18.60 €
Charge 3
16 min · +31 kWh · 18.60 €
Charge 4
20 min · +36 kWh · 21.36 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 8h09
4
Stops
8h09
Duration
86.68 €
Cost of energy used
MercedesDieselFastest
V 300 d 4MATIC (long)
100%
603 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Refuel 1
5 min · +63 L · 136.71 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h06
1
Stops
7h06
Duration
175.57 €
Cost of energy used

The 63-minute lead of the V 300 d 4MATIC (long) (combustion) comes from not needing a charging stop: 1 stop of 5 min versus 4 stops totalling 69 min for the Model S 85 (electric).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The V 300 d 4MATIC (long) (combustion) makes 1 stop of 5 min, the Model S 85 (electric) 4 stops totalling 69 min. Road safety reminder: on a trip of this duration, it is recommended to stop for at least 68 min total (17 min every 2h). The energy cost is 86,68 € for Model S 85 versus 175,57 € for V 300 d 4MATIC (long).

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (23,5 kWh/100km for Model S 85 and 8,7 L/100km for V 300 d 4MATIC (long)) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 24,6 kWh/100km (Model S 85) and 10,4 L/100km (V 300 d 4MATIC (long)). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

What about a 200 km round trip?

On a 200 km round trip (e.g. a weekend getaway), the electric or plug-in hybrid vehicle completes the entire journey on home energy at 0.20 €/kWh - with no charging stop. The time advantage of the combustion car on long-distance motorways disappears entirely, and the economic advantage of electric strengthens considerably.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

Tesla Model S 85

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Beaune, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh283 km70 kWh consumed0.049 €/km13.96 €
Beaune, A6 → Limonest, A6energy charged at Supercharger 116 kW · 0.60 €/kWh126 km31 kWh consumed0.148 €/km18.60 €
Limonest, A6 → Valence, A7energy charged at Supercharger 116 kW · 0.60 €/kWh126 km31 kWh consumed0.148 €/km18.60 €
Valence, A7 → Manosque, A51energy charged at Supercharger 116 kW · 0.60 €/kWh126 km31 kWh consumed0.148 €/km18.60 €
Manosque, A51 → Marseilleenergy charged at Supercharger 107 kW · 0.60 €/kWh114 km28 kWh consumed0.148 €/km16.93 €
Trip total86.68 €

Mercedes V 300 d 4MATIC (long)

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Montélimar, A7fuel · 2.17 €/L603 km63 L consumed0.227 €/km136.71 €
Montélimar, A7 → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L172 km18 L consumed0.226 €/km38.86 €
Trip total175.57 €

Range recovered by stop duration

How many kilometres do you recover depending on the time spent at the charger? Comparison at nominal peak power.
Charging stop durationTesla Model S 85Mercedes V 300 d 4MATIC (long)
5 minutes~28 km-
10 minutes~57 km-
20 minutes~114 km-
Full session 10 → 80 %~220 km · 42 min-

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
23.5 kWh/100 km · 8.7 L/100 km

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

TeslaBEV

Model S 85

362 ch · 77.5 kWh · 2012

MercedesDiesel

V 300 d 4MATIC (long)

245 ch · 2024

Other duels you might be interested in

AudiVSTesla

A6 Avant e-tron vs Model S 85

MercedesVSBMW

V 300 d 4MATIC (long) vs 223d xDrive Active Tourer

BMWVSTesla

i5 xDrive40 vs Model S 85

MercedesVSBMW

V 300 d 4MATIC (long) vs 220d Active Tourer

Frequently asked questions

The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the V 300 d 4MATIC (long) arrives in 7h06 with 1 fuel stop.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 86.68 € (Model S 85) and 175.57 € (V 300 d 4MATIC (long)). For reference, an equivalent BMW 530i (~8.0 L/100 km) would cost about 115 € in fuel.