Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /large SUV
AModelvsBQ4 45BEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsModel · Q4 45

Tesla Model X Performance vs Audi Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

large SUV · 2020 vs 2023 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
TeslaBEVPlus rapide

Model X Performance

778 ch · 100 kWh · 2020

VS
AudiBEV

Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW

286 ch · 77 kWh · 2023

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start 100 % · mild weather

Result · total trip time

ATesla Model X Performance

7h21charging included

2 stops · 62.36 €

Gap16 minin favour of Model X Performance
BAudi Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW

7h37charging included

2 stops · 54.24 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureModel X PerformanceQ4 45 e-tron 210 kWGap
Total time7h217h3716 min · Model X Performance
Charging stops2 stops2 stopsSame
Cost of energy used62.36 €54.24 €8.12 € · Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

TeslaBEVFastest
Model X Performance
100%
473 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
10 min · +40 kWh · 24.00 €
Charge 2
10 min · +40 kWh · 24.15 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h21
2
Stops
7h21
Duration
62.36 €
Cost of energy used
AudiBEV
Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW
100%
437 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
14 min · +31 kWh · 18.48 €
Charge 2
21 min · +42 kWh · 25.07 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h37
2
Stops
7h37
Duration
54.24 €
Cost of energy used

The 16-minute lead of the Model X Performance does not come from driving speed, but from shorter stops on this route (20 min vs 36 min).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: 2 stops totalling 20 min for the Model X Performance versus 2 stops totalling 36 min for the Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (23,6 kWh/100km for Model X Performance and 14,1 kWh/100km for Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 21,1 kWh/100km (Model X Performance) and 17,6 kWh/100km (Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Recovery speed: 19,0 km/min versus 11,4 km/min

During the 20 minutes of charging for the Model X Performance, range recovers by 380 km. During the 36 cumulative minutes for the Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW, range recovers by 412 km. Per minute: the Model X Performance recovers 1,7× faster. At this rate, the charging stop blends into the trip rhythm - just enough time for a coffee. At a lower rate, it dictates the pace.

For reference: how much would an equivalent petrol car cost?

A Peugeot 3008 1.2 PureTech 130 (equivalent segment) consumes about 7,8 L/100km on the motorway at 130 km/h. At 1,9 €/L, this Paris → Marseille trip would cost ~112 €. That is 1,8× the electric cost of the Model X Performance and 2,1× that of the Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW. The gap narrows in winter but never reverses.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

Tesla Model X Performance

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Limonest, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh426 km90 kWh consumed0.042 €/km18.01 €
Limonest, A6 → Montélimar, A7energy charged at Supercharger 240 kW · 0.60 €/kWh189 km40 kWh consumed0.127 €/km24.00 €
Montélimar, A7 → Marseilleenergy charged at Supercharger 242 kW · 0.60 €/kWh160 km34 kWh consumed0.127 €/km20.35 €
Trip total62.36 €

Audi Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Limonest, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh393 km69 kWh consumed0.035 €/km13.87 €
Limonest, A6 → Montélimar, A7energy charged at Ionity 132 kW · 0.60 €/kWh175 km31 kWh consumed0.106 €/km18.48 €
Montélimar, A7 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 119 kW · 0.60 €/kWh207 km36 kWh consumed0.106 €/km21.90 €
Trip total54.24 €

Range recovered by stop duration

How many kilometres do you recover depending on the time spent at the charger? Comparison at nominal peak power.
Charging stop durationTesla Model X PerformanceAudi Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW
5 minutes~69 km~45 km
10 minutes~138 km~89 km
20 minutes~276 km~179 km
Full session 10 → 80 %~331 km · 26 min~306 km · 37 min

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
23.6 kWh/100 km · 14.1 kWh/100 km
Net battery
100 kWh · 77 kWh
Max DC charging
250 kW · 135 kW

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

TeslaBEV

Model X Performance

778 ch · 100 kWh · 2020

AudiBEV

Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW

286 ch · 77 kWh · 2023

Other duels you might be interested in

TeslaVSBMW

Model X Performance vs iX xDrive50

VolvoVSAudi

EX40 Twin Motor AWD vs Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW

TeslaVSBMW

Model X Performance vs iX xDrive40

VolvoVSAudi

XC40 Recharge Twin AWD vs Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW

Frequently asked questions

The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the Model X Performance arrives in 7h21 with 2 charging stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 62.36 € (Model X Performance) and 54.24 € (Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 3008 1.2 PureTech 130 (~7.8 L/100 km) would cost about 112 € in fuel.