XpengBEV
X9
543 ch · 95 kWh · 2024
Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.
| Measure | X9 | V 300 d 4MATIC (long) | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total time | 7h29 | 7h06 | 23 min · V 300 d 4MATIC (long) |
| Charging stops | 3 stops | 1 stop | 2 stops · V 300 d 4MATIC (long) |
| Cost of energy used | 88.57 € | 175.57 € | 87.00 € · X9 |
Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The V 300 d 4MATIC (long) (combustion) makes 1 stop of 5 min, the X9 (electric) 3 stops totalling 28 min. Road safety reminder: on a trip of this duration, it is recommended to stop for at least 51 min total (17 min every 2h). The energy cost is 88,57 € for X9 versus 175,57 € for V 300 d 4MATIC (long).
The official WLTP figures (22,0 kWh/100km for X9 and 8,7 L/100km for V 300 d 4MATIC (long)) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 26,4 kWh/100km (X9) and 10,4 L/100km (V 300 d 4MATIC (long)). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.
On a 200 km round trip (e.g. a weekend getaway), the electric or plug-in hybrid vehicle completes the entire journey on home energy at 0.20 €/kWh - with no charging stop. The time advantage of the combustion car on long-distance motorways disappears entirely, and the economic advantage of electric strengthens considerably.
| Segment | Energy used | Distance | Consumption | €/km | Cost (€) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paris → Tournus, A6 | initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh | 324 km | 86 kWh consumed | 0.053 €/km | 17.11 € |
| Tournus, A6 → Limonest, A6 | energy charged at Ionity 285 kW · 0.60 €/kWh | 144 km | 38 kWh consumed | 0.158 €/km | 22.80 € |
| Limonest, A6 → Montélimar, A7 | energy charged at Ionity 285 kW · 0.60 €/kWh | 144 km | 38 kWh consumed | 0.158 €/km | 22.80 € |
| Montélimar, A7 → Marseille | energy charged at Ionity 255 kW · 0.60 €/kWh | 163 km | 43 kWh consumed | 0.159 €/km | 25.86 € |
| Trip total | 88.57 € |
| Segment | Energy used | Distance | Consumption | €/km | Cost (€) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paris → Montélimar, A7 | fuel · 2.17 €/L | 603 km | 63 L consumed | 0.227 €/km | 136.71 € |
| Montélimar, A7 → Marseille | fuel · 2.17 €/L | 172 km | 18 L consumed | 0.226 €/km | 38.86 € |
| Trip total | 175.57 € |
| Charging stop duration | Xpeng X9 | Mercedes V 300 d 4MATIC (long) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 minutes | ~66 km | - |
| 10 minutes | ~133 km | - |
| 20 minutes | ~265 km | - |
| Full session 10 → 80 % | ~252 km · 20 min | - |
Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment
543 ch · 95 kWh · 2024
245 ch · 2024
The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the V 300 d 4MATIC (long) arrives in 7h06 with 1 fuel stop.
WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.
Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.
No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.
On this trip, the energy used costs 88.57 € (X9) and 175.57 € (V 300 d 4MATIC (long)). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 308 1.2 PureTech 130 (~6.8 L/100 km) would cost about 97 € in fuel.