Among the 33 S 2009–2013, the 911 Carrera 4 (Manual) ranks 32th of 33 in 0–100 km/h (4.9 s, behind the Lamborghini Aventador LP700), 27th of 33 in Top speed (284 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Aventador LP700), 33th of 33 in Power-to-weight (226 hp/t, behind the Lamborghini Aventador LP700).
991.1 · GENERATION 2011 → · SPORTS CAR
PorscheICE
911 Carrera 4 (Manual)
350 hp, 4,9 s 0-100 : among the 33 S 2009–2013, the 911 Carrera 4 (Manual) ranks 32th of 33 in 0–100 km/h, 27th of 33 in Top speed, 33th of 33 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Lamborghini Aventador LP700. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
350hp
390 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
4.9s
VMax 284 km/h
Cons.
11.4L
/100 km
Tank
67.001757L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Porsche 911 Carrera 4 (Manual)
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Boxer · 6 cyl. · Atmosphérique |
| Displacement | 3,614 cm³ |
| Puissance thermique | 350 hp |
| Combined power | 350 hp |
| Combined torque | 390 Nm |
| Gearbox | Manuelle Manuelle |
| Transmission | Propulsion |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 11.4 L/100km |
| Tank | 67.001757 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 4,9 s |
| VMax | 284 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,466 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,350 mm |
| Width | 1,852 mm |
| Height | 1,310 mm |
| Boot | 7 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,552 kg |
| Cd | 0.3 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 33 S, the 911 Carrera 4 (Manual) ranks (in the bottom third) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Acceleration: 4.9 s 0-100 (32th of 33 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the 911 Carrera 4 (Manual) ranks 32th of 33 in 0–100 km/h, 2.0 s off the reference Lamborghini Aventador LP700 (2.9 s).
Top speed: 284 km/h (27th of 33 in Top speed)
Top speed of 284 km/h. The segment reference reaches 350 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the 911 Carrera 4 (Manual) stands against S
Comparison across 33 S marketed between 2009–2013.
0–100 km/h32e / 33
4,9 s
Min 5,0 s · Porsche Cayman S (Manual)Max 2,9 s · Lamborghini Aventador LP700
Top speed27e / 33
284 km/h
Min 275 km/h · Porsche Cayman S (PDK)Max 350 km/h · Lamborghini Aventador LP700
Power-to-weight33e / 33
226 hp/t
Min 226 hp/t · Porsche 911 Carrera 4 (Manual)Max 444 hp/t · Lamborghini Aventador LP700
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Z4 M40i340 hp · 0-100 4.5 s
Z4 M40i340 hp · 0-100 4.5 s
F-TYPE P300300 hp · 0-100 5.7 s
Z4 sDrive30i258 hp · 0-100 5.4 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the 911 Carrera 4 (Manual)
Frequently asked questions
Porsche 911 Carrera 4 (Manual): what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Lamborghini Aventador LP700 leads in 0–100 km/h (2.9 s vs 4.9 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 911 Carrera 4 (Manual) vs Lamborghini Aventador LP700 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.