Among the 17 grand tourers 2024–2028, the A6 Sedan ranks 14th of 17 in Combined consumption (7.8 L/100, behind the Mercedes E 220 d), 8th of 11 in Tank range (718 km, behind the Audi A6 Sedan), 16th of 17 in 0–100 km/h (8.2 s, behind the Audi A6 Sedan TFSI quattro S tronic 270 kW).
C8 · GENERATION 2026 → · GRAND TOURER
AudiICE
A6 Sedan
204 hp, 8,2 s 0-100 : among the 17 grand tourers 2024–2028, the A6 Sedan ranks 14th of 17 in Combined consumption, 8th of 11 in Tank range, 16th of 17 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
204hp
340 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
8.2s
VMax 244 km/h
Cons.
7.8L
/100 km
Tank
56L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Audi A6 Sedan
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Displacement | 1,984 cm³ |
| Power | 204 hp |
| Couple | 340 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 7 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Traction |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 7.8 L/100km |
| Tank | 56 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 8,2 s |
| VMax | 244 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,999 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,927 mm |
| Width | 1,875 mm |
| Height | 1,418 mm |
| Boot | 492 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,770 kg |
| Cd | 0.26 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 177 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 17 grand tourers, the A6 Sedan ranks (in the bottom third) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Fuel consumption: 7.8 L/100 L/100 (14th of 17 in Combined consumption)
The A6 Sedan consumes 7.8 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Mercedes E 220 d (5.4 L/100).
Tank range: 718 km (8th of 11 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the A6 Sedan covers 718 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1071 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the A6 Sedan stands against grand tourers
Comparison across 17 grand tourers marketed between 2024–2028.
Combined consumption14e / 17
7.8 L/100
Min 8.3 L/100 · Audi A6 Avant TFSI quattro S tronic 270 kWMax 5.4 L/100 · Mercedes E 220 d
Tank range8e / 11
718 km
Min 675 km · Audi A6 Avant TFSI quattro S tronic 270 kWMax 1 071 km · Audi A6 Sedan
0–100 km/h16e / 17
8,2 s
Min 8,3 s · Audi A6 Avant TFSI S tronic 150 kWMax 4,7 s · Audi A6 Sedan TFSI quattro S tronic 270 kW
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Audi A6 C8 range
Generation C8 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the C8
Compare
Popular duels involving the A6 Sedan
Frequently asked questions
Audi A6 Sedan: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
718 km on a full tank (7.8 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 8th of 11 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Mercedes E 220 d leads in Combined consumption (5.4 L/100 vs 7.8 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the A6 Sedan vs Mercedes E 220 d duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.