BMW 120d xDrive

DieselcompactGENERATION F40, 2021

190 hp, 7,0 s 0-100 : among the 107 compacts 2019–2023, the 120d xDrive ranks 35th of 103 in Combined consumption, 30th of 95 in Tank range, 34th of 107 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Power
190 hp
400 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
7.0 s
VMax 230 km/h
Cons.
5.1 L
/100 km
Tank
50 L

Full specifications

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Architecture
4 cyl.
Displacement
1,995 cm³
Power
190 hp
Couple
400 Nm
Gearbox
Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
Transmission
Integrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP
5.1 L/100 km
Tank
50 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h
7,0 s
VMax
230 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length
4,319 mm
Wheelbase
2,670 mm
Width
1,799 mm
Height
1,434 mm
Boot
380 L
Kerb weight
1,515 kg
Cd
0.27
CO₂ WLTP
133 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 107 compacts, the 120d xDrive ranks (top 35 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 35th of 103 in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100), 30th of 95 in Tank range (980 km), 34th of 107 in 0–100 km/h (7.0 s).

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the BMW 216d Steptronic (1st with 3.9 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the BMW 216d Steptronic (1st with 1308 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 5.1 L/100 L/100 (35th of 103 in Combined consumption)

The 120d xDrive consumes 5.1 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the BMW 216d Steptronic (3.9 L/100).

Tank range: 980 km (30th of 95 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the 120d xDrive covers 980 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1308 km.

Where the 120d xDrive stands against compacts

Comparison across 107 compacts marketed between 2019–2023.
Combined consumption35e / 103
5.1 L/100
Min 10 L/100 · BMW M2Max 3.9 L/100 · BMW 216d Steptronic
Tank range30e / 95
980 km
Min 520 km · BMW M2Max 1 308 km · BMW 216d Steptronic
0–100 km/h34e / 107
7,0 s
Min 12,3 s · Hyundai i30 Wagon 1.5 DPi 110 chMax 4,1 s · BMW M2

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

The full BMW 1 Series F40 range

Generation F40 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the F40

Popular duels involving the 120d xDrive

Continue with the BMW 120d xDrive

The same car, from other angles.

BMW 120d xDrive: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the 120d xDrive rank in its segment?

Among the 107 compacts 2019–2023, the 120d xDrive ranks 35th of 103 in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100, behind the BMW 216d Steptronic), 30th of 95 in Tank range (980 km, behind the BMW 216d Steptronic), 34th of 107 in 0–100 km/h (7.0 s, behind the BMW M2).

What is the range of the 120d xDrive?

980 km on a full tank (5.1 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 30th of 95 in Tank range.

How much does the 120d xDrive cost to run?

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a BMW 216d Steptronic instead?

The BMW 216d Steptronic leads in Combined consumption (3.9 L/100 vs 5.1 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 120d xDrive vs BMW 216d Steptronic duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.