Among the 99 compacts 2016–2020, the 220i Convertible ranks 68th of 97 in Combined consumption (6.2 L/100, behind the Bmw 216d Gran Coupe), 58th of 90 in Tank range (839 km, behind the Bmw 116d), 51th of 99 in 0–100 km/h (7.7 s, behind the Bmw M140i xDrive).
F22 · GENERATION 2018 → · COMPACT
BMWICE
220i Convertible
184 hp, 7,7 s 0-100 : among the 99 compacts 2016–2020, the 220i Convertible ranks 68th of 97 in Combined consumption, 58th of 90 in Tank range, 51th of 99 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
184hp
270 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
7.7s
VMax 226 km/h
Cons.
6.2L
/100 km
Tank
52L
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW 220i Convertible
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | 4 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,998 cm³ |
| Power | 184 hp |
| Couple | 270 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 6.2 L/100km |
| Tank | 52 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 7,7 s |
| VMax | 226 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,432 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,690 mm |
| Width | 1,774 mm |
| Height | 1,413 mm |
| Boot | 280 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,540 kg |
| Cd | 0.32 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 142 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 99 compacts, the 220i Convertible ranks (in the bottom third) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Fuel consumption: 6.2 L/100 L/100 (68th of 97 in Combined consumption)
The 220i Convertible consumes 6.2 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 216d Gran Coupe (4.1 L/100).
Tank range: 839 km (58th of 90 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 220i Convertible covers 839 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1209 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the 220i Convertible stands against compacts
Comparison across 99 compacts marketed between 2016–2020.
Combined consumption68e / 97
6.2 L/100
Min 10 L/100 · Bmw M2 CompetitionMax 4.1 L/100 · Bmw 216d Gran Coupe
Tank range58e / 90
839 km
Min 520 km · Bmw M2 CompetitionMax 1 209 km · Bmw 116d
0–100 km/h51e / 99
7,7 s
Min 12,3 s · Hyundai i30 Wagon 1.5 DPi 110 PSMax 4,4 s · Bmw M140i xDrive
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
A3 allstreet204 hp · 0-100 6.4 s
A3 Sedan204 hp · 0-100 6.3 s
A3 Sportback TFSI quattro S tronic 150 kW204 hp · 0-100 6.3 s
A3 allstreet150 hp · 0-100 8.4 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the 220i Convertible
Frequently asked questions
BMW 220i Convertible: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
839 km on a full tank (6.2 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 58th of 90 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw 216d Gran Coupe leads in Combined consumption (4.1 L/100 vs 6.2 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 220i Convertible vs Bmw 216d Gran Coupe duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.