F22 · GENERATION 2018 · COMPACT
BMWICE

220d xDrive

190 hp, 7,5 s 0-100 : among the 99 compacts 2016–2020, the 220d xDrive ranks 28th of 97 in Combined consumption, 18th of 90 in Tank range, 48th of 99 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,21315,000 km · UK mix · home UK £/kWhCustomise →

Power

190hp

400 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

7.5s

VMax 222 km/h

Cons.

4.7L

/100 km

Tank

51L

Sur cette page

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW 220d xDrive

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureUnknown · 4 cyl.
Displacement1,995 cm\u00b3
Power190 hp
Couple400 Nm
GearboxTorque Converter 8 rapports Automatic
TransmissionAWD

Consumption

Cons. WLTP4,7 L/100km
Tank51 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h7,5 s
VMax222 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,354 mm
Wheelbase2,670 mm
Width1,800 mm
Height1,555 mm
Boot468 L
Kerb weight1,540 kg
Cd0.28
CO₂ WLTP124 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 99 compacts, the 220d xDrive ranks (top 28 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle

Caralogy Verdict

Suitable for

Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 28th of 97 in Combined consumption (4.7 L/100), 18th of 90 in Tank range (1085 km).

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw 216d Gran Coupe (1st with 4.1 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw 116d (1st with 1209 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 4.7 L/100 L/100 (28th of 97 in Combined consumption)

The 220d xDrive consumes 4.7 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 216d Gran Coupe (4.1 L/100).

Tank range: 1085 km (18th of 90 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the 220d xDrive covers 1085 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1209 km.

Segment positioning

Where the 220d xDrive stands against compacts

Comparison across 99 compacts marketed between 2016–2020.

Combined consumption

28eout of 97

4.7 L/100
Min10 L/100 · Bmw M2 Competition
Max4.1 L/100 · Bmw 216d Gran Coupe

Tank range

18eout of 90

1 085 km
Min520 km · Bmw M2 Competition
Max1 209 km · Bmw 116d

0–100 km/h

48eout of 99

7,5 s
Min12,3 s · Hyundai i30 1.5 DPi 110 PS
Max4,4 s · Bmw M140i xDrive

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Compare

Popular duels involving the 220d xDrive

Take the next step

Find a 220d xDrive or value yours

Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.

Frequently asked questions

BMW 220d xDrive: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the 220d xDrive rank in its segment?#

Among the 99 compacts 2016–2020, the 220d xDrive ranks 28th of 97 in Combined consumption (4.7 L/100, behind the Bmw 216d Gran Coupe), 18th of 90 in Tank range (1085 km, behind the Bmw 116d), 48th of 99 in 0–100 km/h (7.5 s, behind the Bmw M140i xDrive).

What is the range of the 220d xDrive?#

1085 km on a full tank (4.7 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 18th of 90 in autonomie du segment.

How much does the 220d xDrive cost to run?#

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Bmw 216d Gran Coupe instead?#

The Bmw 216d Gran Coupe leads in Combined consumption (4.1 L/100 vs 4.7 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 220d xDrive vs Bmw 216d Gran Coupe duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?#

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.