Among the 18 grand tourers plug-in hybrid 2024–2028, the A6 Avant e-hybrid quattro S tronic 220 kW ranks 7th of 18 in Electric WLTP range (90 km, behind the Audi A6 Sedan e-hybrid quattro S tronic 270 kW), 13th of 18 in Combined range (747 km, behind the Mercedes AMG E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ Limousine), 10th of 18 in Thermal cons. estimated (7.0 L/100, behind the Mercedes E 300 de 4MATIC T-Modell All-Terrain), 11th of 18 in 0–100 km/h (6.0 s, behind the Mercedes AMG E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ Limousine).
C8 · GENERATION 2026 → · GRAND TOURER
AudiPHEV
A6 Avant e-hybrid quattro S tronic 220 kW
299 hp, 90 km electric range, 6,0 s 0-100 : among the 18 grand tourers plug-in hybrid 2024–2028, the A6 Avant e-hybrid quattro S tronic 220 kW ranks 7th of 18 in Electric WLTP range, 13th of 18 in Combined range, 10th of 18 in Thermal cons. estimated, 11th of 18 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
299hp
450 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
6.0s
VMax 250 km/h
Total range
747km
of which 90 km elec
Battery + Tank
20.7kWh
+ 46 L tank
Technical identity card
Full specifications Audi A6 Avant e-hybrid quattro S tronic 220 kW
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Displacement | 1,984 cm³ |
| Power | 299 hp |
| Couple | 450 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 7 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Battery and charging
| Battery capacity | 20.7 kWh |
| Range WLTP | 90 km |
| Charge AC max | 11 kW |
| Conso élec WLTP | 23.0 kWh/100km |
| Petrol cons. WLTP | 2.9 L/100km |
| Conso thermique | 7.0 L/100km |
| Tank | 46 L |
| EV range motorway | 72 km |
| Total range motorway | 747 km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 6,0 s |
| VMax | 250 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,999 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,927 mm |
| Width | 1,875 mm |
| Height | 1,438 mm |
| Boot | 404 L |
| Kerb weight | 2,150 kg |
| Cd | 0.28 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 65 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 18 grand tourers plug-in hybrid, the A6 Avant e-hybrid quattro S tronic 220 kW combines two vehicles in one: an electric sedan for urban use (mid-table), a petrol tourer for long distances. Caralogy puts the A6 Avant e-hybrid quattro S tronic 220 kW through its paces: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Home-to-office commute up to 60 km in pure electric. Overnight charging is sufficient.
Less suitable for
Very long trips without stopping. With 747 km combined range, expect more frequent refuelling than other PHEVs in the segment.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Electric WLTP range, the Audi A6 Sedan e-hybrid quattro S tronic 270 kW (1st with 101 km) takes the lead. If the priority is Combined range, the Mercedes AMG E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ Limousine (1st with 1184 km) takes the lead.
In the city: 90 km pure electric (mid-table)
With a full battery, the A6 Avant e-hybrid quattro S tronic 220 kW drives in pure electric mode for the first 90 km WLTP - placing it 7th of 18 in Electric WLTP range, behind the Audi A6 Sedan e-hybrid quattro S tronic 270 kW (101 km). In urban and peri-urban use, the A6 Avant e-hybrid quattro S tronic 220 kW behaves like a pure electric sedan in its segment.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the A6 Avant e-hybrid quattro S tronic 220 kW stands against grand tourers plug-in hybrid
Comparison across 18 grand tourers plug-in hybrid marketed between 2024–2028.
Electric WLTP range7e / 18
90 km
Min 82 km · Bmw 550e xDrive TouringMax 101 km · Audi A6 Sedan e-hybrid quattro S tronic 270 kW
Combined range13e / 18
747 km
Min 83 km · Bmw 530e xDriveMax 1 184 km · Mercedes AMG E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ Limousine
Thermal cons. estimated10e / 18
7 L/100
Min 8.5 L/100 · Bmw 550e xDriveMax 5.5 L/100 · Mercedes E 300 de 4MATIC T-Modell All-Terrain
0–100 km/h11e / 18
6,0 s
Min 6,9 s · Mercedes E 300 de 4MATIC All-Terrain EstateMax 3,8 s · Mercedes AMG E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ Limousine
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
530e299 hp · 0-100 6.3 s
530e Touring299 hp · 0-100 6.4 s
530e xDrive299 hp · 0-100 6.3 s
530e xDrive Touring299 hp · 0-100 6.4 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Audi A6 C8 range
Generation C8 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the C8
Compare
Popular duels involving the A6 Avant e-hybrid quattro S tronic 220 kW
Frequently asked questions
Audi A6 Avant e-hybrid quattro S tronic 220 kW: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
90 km WLTP announced - making it the 7th of 18 in autonomie du segment out of 18 models. The reference is the Audi A6 Sedan e-hybrid quattro S tronic 270 kW (101 km).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Audi A6 Sedan e-hybrid quattro S tronic 270 kW leads in Electric WLTP range (101 km vs 90 km). The choice depends on your priorities: check the A6 Avant e-hybrid quattro S tronic 220 kW vs Audi A6 Sedan e-hybrid quattro S tronic 270 kW duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.