Among the 93 grand tourers 2016–2020, the 530i xDrive ranks 63th of 93 in Combined consumption (6.5 L/100, behind the Bmw 520d), 61th of 91 in Tank range (1046 km, behind the Bmw 520d), 46th of 93 in 0–100 km/h (6.0 s, behind the Bmw M5 Competition).
G30 · GENERATION 2018 → · GRAND TOURER
BMWICE
530i xDrive
252 hp, 6,0 s 0-100 : among the 93 grand tourers 2016–2020, the 530i xDrive ranks 63th of 93 in Combined consumption, 61th of 91 in Tank range, 46th of 93 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
252hp
350 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
6.0s
VMax 250 km/h
Cons.
6.5L
/100 km
Tank
68L
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW 530i xDrive
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | 4 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,998 cm³ |
| Power | 252 hp |
| Couple | 350 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 6.5 L/100km |
| Tank | 68 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 6,0 s |
| VMax | 250 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,936 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,975 mm |
| Width | 1,868 mm |
| Height | 1,479 mm |
| Boot | 530 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,605 kg |
| Cd | 0.25 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 147 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 93 grand tourers, the 530i xDrive ranks (in the bottom third) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Fuel consumption: 6.5 L/100 L/100 (63th of 93 in Combined consumption)
The 530i xDrive consumes 6.5 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 520d (4.3 L/100).
Tank range: 1046 km (61th of 91 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 530i xDrive covers 1046 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1535 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the 530i xDrive stands against grand tourers
Comparison across 93 grand tourers marketed between 2016–2020.
Combined consumption63e / 93
6.5 L/100
Min 10.8 L/100 · Bmw M5Max 4.3 L/100 · Bmw 520d
Tank range61e / 91
1 046 km
Min 630 km · Bmw M5Max 1 535 km · Bmw 520d
0–100 km/h46e / 93
6,0 s
Min 8,2 s · Bmw 520iMax 3,3 s · Bmw M5 Competition
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
S90 B5 AWD250 hp · 0-100 6.6 s
V90 B5 AWD250 hp · 0-100 6.7 s
A6 45 TFSI245 hp · 0-100 6.4 s
A6 Avant TFSI S tronic 150 kW204 hp · 0-100 8.3 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full BMW 5 Series G30 range
Generation G30 launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G30
Compare
Popular duels involving the 530i xDrive
Frequently asked questions
BMW 530i xDrive: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
1046 km on a full tank (6.5 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 61th of 91 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw 520d leads in Combined consumption (4.3 L/100 vs 6.5 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 530i xDrive vs Bmw 520d duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.