BMW 540i
340 hp, 5,1 s 0-100 : among the 32 grand tourers 2016–2020, the 540i ranks 21th of 32 in 0–100 km/h, 2nd of 32 in Top speed, 9th of 32 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 340 hp
- 450 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 5.1 s
- VMax 250 km/h
- Cons.
- 7.4 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 68 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- 6 cyl.
- Displacement
- 2,998 cm³
- Power
- 340 hp
- Couple
- 450 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
- Transmission
- Propulsion
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 7.4 L/100 km
- Tank
- 68 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 5,1 s
- VMax
- 250 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,936 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,975 mm
- Width
- 1,868 mm
- Height
- 1,479 mm
- Boot
- 530 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,595 kg
- Cd
- 0.25
- CO₂ WLTP
- 168 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 32 grand tourers, the 540i ranks (mid-table) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Demanding drivers: 2nd of 32 in Top speed (250 km/h), 9th of 32 in Power-to-weight (213 hp/t). 2nd of 32 in Top speed (250 km/h), 9th of 32 in Power-to-weight (213 hp/t).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 7,4 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the BMW M5 Competition (1st with 3.3 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the BMW 540d xDrive (1st with 250 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 5.1 s 0-100 (21th of 32 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the 540i ranks 21th of 32 in 0–100 km/h, 1.8 s off the reference BMW M5 Competition (3.3 s).
Top speed: 250 km/h (2nd of 32 in Top speed)
Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 250 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripChronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performanceWhere the 540i stands against grand tourers
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW 5 Series G30 range
Generation G30 launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G30
Popular duels involving the 540i
Continue with the BMW 540i
The same car, from other angles.
BMW 540i: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the 540i rank in its segment?
Among the 32 grand tourers 2016–2020, the 540i ranks 21th of 32 in 0–100 km/h (5.1 s, behind the BMW M5 Competition), 2nd of 32 in Top speed (250 km/h, behind the BMW 540d xDrive), 9th of 32 in Power-to-weight (213 hp/t, behind the BMW M5 Competition).
How much does the 540i cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a BMW M5 Competition instead?
The BMW M5 Competition leads in 0–100 km/h (3.3 s vs 5.1 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 540i vs BMW M5 Competition duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.