On a 100 km mixed trip, the Audi RS e-tron GT is about 25% cheaper than the Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
Consumption comparison
Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.
353 €per year
11,8 kWh/100 km weighted · 2,35 € per 100 km · 1 763 kWh per year
Cheaper to run458 €per year
15,3 kWh/100 km weighted · 3,05 € per 100 km · 2 289 kWh per year
Annual mileage
15 000 km/an
Simulated driving mix
Drag anywhere on the bar to adjust
Charging type
| Profile | Split | RS | Model 3 | Gap | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City | 70 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway | 300 € | 463 € | 163 € | RS |
| Mixed | 30 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway | 353 € | 458 € | 105 € | RS |
| Long-distance | 10 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway | 417 € | 465 € | 48 € | RS |
On a 100 km mixed trip, the Audi RS e-tron GT is about 25% cheaper than the Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD offers more range: 629 km vs 533 km for Audi RS e-tron GT (WLTP/EPA). In real motorway use, expect 10-20% less depending on temperature.
The Audi RS e-tron GT is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.