Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Consumption
  3. /SUV
iXvsMustangBEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsiX · Mustang

BMW iX M60 I20 vs Ford Mustang Mach-E GT: which is cheaper to run?

What each kilometre costs, depending on your driving profile and how you charge. Annual projection and cumulative savings over 10 years.

luxury SUV · 2022 vs 2021 · 15,000 km/an · Mixed · Home 0.20 €/kWh · Methodology
Annual mileage
15,000 km
5,000 km50,000 km
Driving mix

30 % City · 50 % Road · 20 % Motorway

Charging type

Result · yearly energy cost

ABMW iX M60 I20

727 €per year

24,2 kWh/100 km weighted · 4.85 € per 100 km · 3 635 kWh per year

Gap78 € per yearin favour of the Mustang Mach-E GT (−11 %)≈ 36 L petrol 95
BFord Mustang Mach-E GT

649 €per year

21,6 kWh/100 km weighted · 4.33 € per 100 km · 3 245 kWh per year

The verdict changes with your usage
ProfileSplitAA · iXBB · MustangGap
City70 / 25 / 570 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway619 €553 €66 € · Mustang
Mixed30 / 50 / 2030 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway727 €649 €78 € · Mustang
Long-distance10 / 40 / 5010 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway860 €768 €92 € · Mustang

Cumulative saving for the Mustang Mach-E GT

1 year
78 €
3 years
234 €
5 years
390 €
10 years
780 €

Energy only. Excludes purchase, insurance, servicing, depreciation.

What produces these figures

WLTP combined
23.3 kWh/100 km · 20.8 kWh/100 km
Powertrain
Fully electric · Fully electric
Power
619 ch · 487 ch
Kerb weight
2,640 kg · 2,108 kg

Other similar comparisons

BMWVSMercedes

iX M60 vs AMG G 63

gap 5 833 €/year
MercedesVSFord

GLC 400 4MATIC vs Mustang Mach-E GT

gap 316 €/year
BMWVSMercedes

iX M60 vs AMG G 63

gap 5 833 €/year
MercedesVSFord

GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology vs Mustang Mach-E GT

gap 316 €/year

Frequently asked questions

On a 100 km mixed trip, the Ford Mustang Mach-E GT is about 10% cheaper than the BMW iX M60 with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.

BMW iX M60 offers more range: 566 km vs 490 km for Ford Mustang Mach-E GT (WLTP/EPA). In real motorway use, expect 10-20% less depending on temperature.

The Ford Mustang Mach-E GT is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.