On a 100 km mixed trip, the Ford Mustang Mach-E RWD is about 10% cheaper than the BMW iX3 with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
Consumption comparison
Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.
531 €per year
17,7 kWh/100 km weighted · 3,54 € per 100 km · 2 652 kWh per year
Cheaper to runAnnual mileage
15 000 km/an
Simulated driving mix
Drag anywhere on the bar to adjust
Charging type
| Profile | Split | iX3 | Mustang | Gap | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City | 70 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway | 505 € | 452 € | 53 € | Mustang |
| Mixed | 30 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway | 593 € | 531 € | 62 € | Mustang |
| Long-distance | 10 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway | 701 € | 628 € | 74 € | Mustang |
On a 100 km mixed trip, the Ford Mustang Mach-E RWD is about 10% cheaper than the BMW iX3 with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
BMW iX3 offers more range: 460 km vs 440 km for Ford Mustang Mach-E RWD (WLTP/EPA). In real motorway use, expect 10-20% less depending on temperature.
The Ford Mustang Mach-E RWD is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.