On a 100 km mixed trip, the Ford Mustang Mach-E GT is about 80% cheaper than the Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300 with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
Consumption comparison
Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.
649 €per year
21,6 kWh/100 km weighted · 4,33 € per 100 km · 3 245 kWh per year
Cheaper to runAnnual mileage
15 000 km/an
Simulated driving mix
Drag anywhere on the bar to adjust
Charging type
Fuel price
Petrol 95 : 2,03 €/L·Diesel : 2,25 €/L
prix-carburants.gouv.fr — moyenne nationale du 25/08/2026 ; EDF Tarif Bleu Base au 01/08/2026 ; DC autoroute : moyenne des réseaux sans abonnement
| Profile | Split | Mustang | Explorer | Gap | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City | 70 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway | 553 € | 3 518 € | 2 965 € | Mustang |
| Mixed | 30 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway | 649 € | 3 123 € | 2 473 € | Mustang |
| Long-distance | 10 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway | 768 € | 2 809 € | 2 041 € | Mustang |
On a 100 km mixed trip, the Ford Mustang Mach-E GT is about 80% cheaper than the Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300 with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
The declared range of the Ford Mustang Mach-E GT is 490 km (WLTP/EPA). In real-world conditions, expect 10-20% less.
The Ford Mustang Mach-E GT is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.