JeepPetrol
Wrangler Rubicon
Annual energy cost · 15 000 km
4 143€
27,62 € / 100 km
Equivalent to 2 038 L of petrol 95 per year
- Weighted consumption
- 13,6 L/100km
- Fuel price
- 2,03 €/L
- Fuel used
- 2037,8 L per year
Consumption comparison
Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.
Annual mileage
15 000 km/an
Simulated driving mix
Drag anywhere on the bar to adjust
Fuel price
Petrol 95 : 2,03 €/L·Diesel : 2,25 €/L
Typical annual usage : Mix 30% city / 50% road / 20% motorway
Annual energy cost · 15 000 km
27,62 € / 100 km
Equivalent to 2 038 L of petrol 95 per year
Annual energy cost · 15 000 km
12,77 € / 100 km
Equivalent to 942 L of petrol 95 per year
Ford Puma ST 200 costs 2 228 €/an less in energy than Jeep Wrangler Rubicon, over 15 000 km for this driving mix.
≈ 1096 L of petrol 95 saved per year
Cumulative projection by annual mileage. The cheaper-to-run vehicle widens the gap year after year.
1 year
2 228 €
≈ 1096 L petrol 95
3 years
6 683 €
≈ 3287 L petrol 95
5 years
11 138 €
≈ 5479 L petrol 95
10 years
22 277 €
≈ 10958 L petrol 95
Cumulative savings for Ford Puma ST 200 versus Jeep Wrangler Rubicon. Excluding purchase, insurance, maintenance and depreciation.
Projection over 15 000 km/year.
| Fuel | km/year | €/km | Annual cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual fuel2,03 €/L | 15 000 km | 0,276 €/km | 4 143 € |
| Fuel | km/year | €/km | Annual cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual fuel2,03 €/L | 15 000 km | 0,128 €/km | 1 915 € |
On a 100 km mixed trip, the Ford Puma ST 200 is about 55% cheaper than the Jeep Wrangler Rubicon with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
The Ford Puma ST 200 is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.