On a 100 km mixed trip, the Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology is about 10% cheaper than the Tesla Model Y Juniper Long Range AWD with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
Consumption comparison
Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.
412 €per year
13,7 kWh/100 km weighted · 2,75 € per 100 km · 2 059 kWh per year
Cheaper to run467 €per year
15,6 kWh/100 km weighted · 3,11 € per 100 km · 2 333 kWh per year
Annual mileage
15 000 km/an
Simulated driving mix
Drag anywhere on the bar to adjust
Charging type
| Profile | Split | GLC | Model | Gap | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City | 70 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway | 351 € | 468 € | 117 € | GLC |
| Mixed | 30 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway | 412 € | 467 € | 55 € | GLC |
| Long-distance | 10 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway | 487 € | 482 € | 5 € | Nearly level |
On a 100 km mixed trip, the Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology is about 10% cheaper than the Tesla Model Y Juniper Long Range AWD with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology offers more range: 713 km vs 611 km for Tesla Model Y Juniper Long Range AWD (WLTP/EPA). In real motorway use, expect 10-20% less depending on temperature.
The Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.