Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Consumption
  3. /SUV
ArkanaHybridvsPumaPetrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsArkana · Puma

Renault Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 vs Ford Puma EcoBoost 125: which is cheaper to run?

What each kilometre costs, depending on your driving profile and how you charge. Annual projection and cumulative savings over 10 years.

compact SUV · 2021 vs 2020 · 15,000 km/an · Mixed · Petrol 95 2.17 €/L · Methodology
Annual mileage
15,000 km
5,000 km50,000 km
Driving mix

30 % City · 50 % Road · 20 % Motorway

Fuel price
Petrol 95 2.17 €/L · Diesel 2.38 €/Lprix-carburants.gouv.fr — moyenne nationale du 05/10/2026 ; EDF Tarif Bleu Base au 01/08/2026 ; DC autoroute : moyenne des réseaux sans abonnement

Result · yearly energy cost

ARenault Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145

1,701 €per year

5,2 L/100 km weighted · 11.34 € per 100 km · 784 L per year

Gap252 € per yearin favour of the Puma EcoBoost 125 (−15 %)≈ 116 L petrol 95
BFord Puma EcoBoost 125

1,448 €per year

4,5 L/100 km weighted · 9.66 € per 100 km · 668 L per year

The verdict changes with your usage
ProfileSplitAA · ArkanaBB · PumaGap
City70 / 25 / 570 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway1,900 €1,554 €346 € · Puma
Mixed30 / 50 / 2030 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway1,701 €1,448 €252 € · Puma
Long-distance10 / 40 / 5010 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway1,546 €1,374 €173 € · Puma

Cumulative saving for the Puma EcoBoost 125

1 year
252 €
3 years
757 €
5 years
1,261 €
10 years
2,523 €

Energy only. Excludes purchase, insurance, servicing, depreciation.

What produces these figures

WLTP combined
5.0 L/100 km · 4.3 L/100 km
Power
143 ch · 125 ch
Kerb weight
1,528 kg · 1,228 kg

Other similar comparisons

RenaultVSKia

Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 vs Niro HEV FWD

gap 189 €/year
FordVSHonda

Puma EcoBoost 125 vs HR-V

gap 61 €/year
RenaultVSBMW

Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 vs X1 sDrive18i

gap 432 €/year
PeugeotVSFord

2008 PureTech 130 EAT8 vs Puma EcoBoost 125

gap 816 €/year

Frequently asked questions

On a 100 km mixed trip, the Ford Puma EcoBoost 125 is about 15% cheaper than the Renault Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.

The Ford Puma EcoBoost 125 is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.